State of California v. United States Department of Labor et al
Filing
112
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/2016 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendants' 99 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' 104 Motion for Summary Judgment set for 5/2/2016 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET for 5/13/2016 at 10:00 a.m. (Zignago, K.)
1
10
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
JUDRY L. SUBAR
Assistant Director
SUSAN K. ULLMAN
Senior Trial Counsel
RYAN B. PARKER
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530
Tel: (202) 514-4336; Fax: (202) 616-8202
11
Attorneys for Defendants
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Case No. 2:13-CV-02069-KJM-DAD
16
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF LABOR, et al.,
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS,
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Defendants.
JUDGE: The Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
PLACE: Courtroom 3, 15th Floor
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER BASED UPON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
ORDER
1
2
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN AND THE PARTIES HAVING
3
STIPULATED THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion
4
to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 99) and Plaintiffs’ Motion
5
for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 104) set for May 2, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and
6
RESET for May 13, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
7
Dated: April 19, 2016
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER BASED UPON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?