State of California v. United States Department of Labor et al

Filing 112

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/2016 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendants' 99 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' 104 Motion for Summary Judgment set for 5/2/2016 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET for 5/13/2016 at 10:00 a.m. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 10 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JUDRY L. SUBAR Assistant Director SUSAN K. ULLMAN Senior Trial Counsel RYAN B. PARKER Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Tel: (202) 514-4336; Fax: (202) 616-8202 11 Attorneys for Defendants 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Case No. 2:13-CV-02069-KJM-DAD 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. JUDGE: The Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller PLACE: Courtroom 3, 15th Floor 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER BASED UPON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ORDER 1 2 GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN AND THE PARTIES HAVING 3 STIPULATED THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion 4 to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 99) and Plaintiffs’ Motion 5 for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 104) set for May 2, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and 6 RESET for May 13, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. 7 Dated: April 19, 2016 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER BASED UPON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?