Gaines v. Bennett et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/4/15 granting Defendants' 24 Motion to amend their answer to the complaint. Within seven days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall separately file and serve their Amended Answer. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
JAMES CALVIN GAINES,
2:13-cv-02070 AC P
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
15
16
C/O BENNETT, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the unopposed request of Defendants Neimann and
20
Bennett, ECF No. 24, to amend their answer to the complaint is HEREBY GRANTED. See
21
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Within seven days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall
22
separately file and serve their Amended Answer (currently set forth in proposed form at ECF No.
23
24 at 6-12).
24
SO ORDERED.
25
DATED: June 4, 2015
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order (2:13-cv-02070 AC P)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?