Gaines v. Bennett et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/4/15 granting Defendants' 24 Motion to amend their answer to the complaint. Within seven days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall separately file and serve their Amended Answer. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 JAMES CALVIN GAINES, 2:13-cv-02070 AC P 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER 15 16 C/O BENNETT, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the unopposed request of Defendants Neimann and 20 Bennett, ECF No. 24, to amend their answer to the complaint is HEREBY GRANTED. See 21 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Within seven days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall 22 separately file and serve their Amended Answer (currently set forth in proposed form at ECF No. 23 24 at 6-12). 24 SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: June 4, 2015 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order (2:13-cv-02070 AC P)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?