Lavery v. Dhillon
Filing
197
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/20/19 DENYING 195 Motion for a protective order and DENYING 196 Motion for Protective Order and request for legal papers. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH LAVERY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-2083 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
B. DHILLON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with court-appointed counsel for the limited
17
18
purposes of completion of discovery. The appointment of counsel was made on July 12, 2018.
19
See ECF No. 172.
20
On May 24, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order. ECF No. 195.
21
Thereafter, on June 7, 2019, plaintiff filed a second motion for a protective order as well as a
22
request for legal papers. ECF No. 196. These motions were filed by plaintiff independent of his
23
court-appointed counsel.
The court reminds plaintiff that he has been appointed counsel in this matter. As a result,
24
25
counsel is to file motions on his behalf. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654 (stating parties may plead and
26
conduct their own cases either personally or by counsel). Documents filed by plaintiff in pro se
27
while he is represented by pro bono counsel will not be considered.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order filed May 24, 2019 (ECF No. 195) is
3
4
DENIED, and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order and request for legal papers filed June 7, 2019
5
(ECF No. 196) is DENIED.
6
DATED: June 20, 2019
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?