Lavery v. Dhillon

Filing 201

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/24/2019 GRANTING plaintiff's 200 motion (application) and ORDERING, within 48 hours of the date of this order, Attorney Thomas Cregger shall inform the court of the steps that he has taken to date to schedule and notice the deposition of plaintiff during the last week of July 2019. If, after providing the aforementioned information to the court, Attorney Cregger has determined that the deposition cannot occur next week, in the same filing, he is to provide the court and Attorney Weinstein-Hamilton with a reasonable time-period within which he believes he will be able to schedule and notice the deposition of plaintiff. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH LAVERY, 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-2083 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. DHILLON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On June 21, 2019, defendant Dhillon filed a motion for a fifty-day extension of time to 18 extend discovery. ECF No. 198. The court granted the motion on June 24, 2019. ECF No. 199. 19 As a result, the discovery cut-off date has been extended to August 15, 2019. See id. 20 Despite this modification to the discovery schedule, per the request of Thomas Cregger, 21 counsel for defendant Dhillon, defendant Dhillon’s deposition of plaintiff remained scheduled to 22 take place during the last week of July on a date previously agreed upon by both parties. See 23 ECF Nos. 198 at 2, 199. To date, nothing has been filed by Attorney Cregger suggesting 24 otherwise. 25 On July 23, 2019, plaintiff filed an application for an order directing defense counsel to 26 provide details for the deposition of plaintiff. ECF No. 200. In support of the filing, Rebecca 27 Weinstein-Hamilton, limited purpose counsel for plaintiff, ultimately states that in recent weeks, 28 she has attempted to contact Attorney Cregger several times in order to confirm that he has 1 1 retained the court and video reporters for plaintiff’s deposition, and that to date, Attorney Cregger 2 has not responded to her inquiries. See ECF No. 200 at 5-6. In addition, she states that to date, 3 Attorney Cregger has not noticed the deposition of plaintiff. See id. at 6. 4 5 In light of the above, and due to the fact that the deposition of plaintiff has been ordered to take place sometime next week (see ECF No. 199), the court shall grant plaintiff’s application. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Within forty-eight hours of the date of this order, Attorney Thomas Cregger shall 8 inform the court of the steps that he has taken to date to schedule and notice the deposition of 9 plaintiff during the last week of July 2019, and 10 2. If, after providing the aforementioned information to the court, Attorney Cregger has 11 determined that the deposition cannot occur next week, in the same filing, he is to provide the 12 court and Attorney Weinstein-Hamilton with a reasonable time-period within which he believes 13 he will be able to schedule and notice the deposition of plaintiff. 14 DATED: July 24, 2019 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?