Lavery v. Dhillon
Filing
215
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/09/20 DENYING 214 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order within which to file his opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment. the Cle rk of Court shall re-serve the followingdocuments on plaintiff at his new address: The courts service order dated December 24, 2014 (ECF No. 36), and the courts March 2, 2020 order directing plaintiff to file an opposition to defendant Dhillons motion for summary judgment 212 . (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH LAVERY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-2083 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
B. DHILLON, et al.
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel to assist him with opposing defendant
18
Dhillon’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 214. In the motion, plaintiff also informs the
19
court of a change of address. Presumably as a result of the move, he does not have access to the
20
legal documents he needs to respond to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See generally
21
id. at 1.
22
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require
23
counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490
24
U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary
25
assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017
26
(9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).
27
In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances.
28
Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. The court will,
1
1
however, also construe plaintiff’s motion as a request for an of time to file his opposition to
2
defendant’s motion for summary judgment. That request will be granted.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 214) is DENIED; and
5
2. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order within which to file his
6
opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition within the
7
time allotted may result in a recommendation that defendant’s motion for summary judgment be
8
granted.
9
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall re-serve the following
documents on plaintiff at his new address:
11
1. The court’s service order dated December 24, 2014 (ECF No. 36), and
12
2. The court’s March 2, 2020 order directing plaintiff to file an opposition to defendant
13
Dhillon’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 212).
14
DATED: March 9, 2020
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?