Barr et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/22/2014 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING 16 Request for Judicial Notice and GRANTING 15 Motion to Dismiss. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JACOB BARR, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

No. 2:13-CV-2087-JAM-CMK PS

v.

ORDER

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, bring this civil action for damages and

18

declaratory relief. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

Eastern District of California local rules.
On August 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

20
21

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file

22

objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been

23

filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The findings and recommendations filed August 15, 2014, are adopted in

4

2.

Defendant’s unopposed request for judicial notice (Doc. 16) is granted;

5

3.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 15) is granted;

6

4.

This action is dismissed with prejudice; and

7

5.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.

3

full;

8
DATED: October 22, 2014
9
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2