Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Barclays Bank PLC et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/26/13 GRANTING request to modify Briefing Page Limits. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 THOMAS J. NOLAN (SBN 66992) Thomas.Nolan@skadden.com 2 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 300 South Grand Avenue 3 Los Angeles, California 90071-3144 Telephone: (213) 687-5000 Facsimile: (213) 687-5600 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant BARCLAYS BANK PLC 6 Please see continuation page for a complete list of counsel for Defendants. 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 BARCLAYS BANK PLC; DANIEL BRIN; 14 SCOTT CONNELLY; KAREN LEVINE; and RYAN SMITH, 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DAD ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS [FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH (1) DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS IN RESPONSE TO PETITION; (2) DECLARATION OF JOHN N. ESTES III IN SUPPORT THEREOF] Presiding: Courtroom: Trial Date: Hon. Troy L. Nunley 2 None Set 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 1 CONTINUATION SHEET: PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL 2 JAY B. KASNER (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jay.Kasner@skadden.com 3 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 4 Times Square 4 New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 735-3000 Facsimile: (212) 735-2000 5 6 PATRICK FITZGERALD (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com 7 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 155 North Wacker Drive 8 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Telephone: (312) 407-0700 Facsimile: (312) 407-0411 9 10 JOHN N. ESTES III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) John.Estes@skadden.com 11 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. 12 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 371-7000 Facsimile: (202) 393-5760 13 14 GREGORY A. MARKEL (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Greg.Markel@cwt.com 15 JASON M. HALPER (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jason.Halper@cwt.com 16 CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP One World Financial Center 17 New York, New York 10281 Telephone: (212) 504-6000 Facsimile: (212) 504-6666 18 19 PAUL J. PANTANO JR. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Paul.Pantano@cwt.com 20 CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP 700 Sixth Street, N.W. 21 Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 862-2410 Facsimile: (202) 862-2400 22 23 Attorneys for Defendant BARCLAYS BANK PLC 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 1 SUSAN L. GERMAISE (SBN 176595) sgermaise@mcguirewoods.com 2 McGUIREWOODS LLP 1800 Century Park East, 8th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 315-8200 4 Facsimile: (310) 315-8210 5 TODD MULLINS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) tmullins@mcguirewoods.com 6 McGUIREWOODS, LLP 2001 K Street, N.W. 7 Washington, D.C. 20006-1040 Telephone: (202) 857-1752 8 Facsimile: (202) 828-3320 9 ALLISON D. CHARNEY (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) acharney@mcguirewoods.com 10 McGUIREWOODS LLP 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th Floor 11 New York, New York 10105 Telephone: (212) 548-2166 12 Facsimile: (212) 715-6279 13 Attorneys for Defendants DANIEL BRIN and SCOTT CONNELLY 14 KRYSTAL N. BOWEN (SBN 163972) 15 Krystal.Bowen@bingham.com BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 16 Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 17 Telephone: (415) 393-2760 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 18 MICHAEL L. SPAFFORD (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 19 Michael.Spafford@bingham.com J. BUB WINDLE (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 20 Bub.Windle@bingham.com BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 21 2020 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 22 Telephone: (202) 373-6000 Facsimile: (202) 373-6001 23 Attorneys for Defendants KAREN LEVINE 24 and RYAN SMITH 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 1 2 ORDER The Court, having considered Defendants’ Request to Modify Briefing Page Limits in 3 Response to Petition (the “Request”) and the Declaration of John N. Estes III in support thereof, 4 and for good cause shown, hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Request, and it is hereby ORDERED 5 that: 6 1. Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) and the individual traders named herein, 7 Daniel Brin, Scott Connelly, Karen Levine and Ryan Smith (collectively, the “Individual Traders”) 8 are entitled to file a total of fifty-five (55) briefing pages when filing their anticipated motions in 9 response to the “Petition for an Order Affirming the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s July 10 16, 2013 Order Assessing Civil Penalties Against Barclays Bank PLC, Daniel Brin, Scott 11 Connelly, Karen Levine, and Ryan Smith,” allocated forty-five (45) pages to Barclays and ten (10) 12 pages to the Individual Traders. 13 2. FERC is entitled to fifty-five (55) briefing pages in opposition, allocated 14 comparably. 15 3. Barclays and the Individual Traders, in responding to FERC’s oppositions, are 16 entitled to twenty-five (25) briefing pages, allocated twenty (20) pages to Barclays and five (5) 17 pages to the Individual Traders. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: November 26, 2013 22 23 24 25 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 DATED: November 25, 2013 3 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM, LLP 4 By: 5 /s/ Thomas J. Nolan Thomas J. Nolan Attorneys for BARCLAYS BANK PLC 6 7 DATED: November 25, 2013 8 CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP 9 By: /s/ Gregory A. Markel (as authorized on 11/25/2013) Gregory A. Markel (admitted pro hac vice) 10 Attorneys for BARCLAYS BANK PLC 11 12 DATED: November 25, 2013 13 McGUIREWOODS, LLP 14 By: /s/ Todd Mullins (as authorized on 11/25/2013) Todd Mullins (admitted pro hac vice) 15 Attorneys for DANIEL BRIN and SCOTT CONNELLY 16 17 DATED: November 25, 2013 18 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 19 By: /s/ Michael L. Spafford (as authorized on 11/25/2013) Michael L. Spafford (admitted pro hac vice) 20 21 Attorneys for KAREN LEVINE and RYAN SMITH 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?