Winn v. McDonald

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/20/2016 ORDERING that the 19 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Petitioner's 16 request for a stay is DENIED. Respondent's 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition, including exhausted claims only, within 28 days of service of this order. Should petitioner fail to file an amended and fully exhausted petition, the claims identified in the 19 findings and recommendations as unexhausted will be stricken and those portions of the petition disregarded for all purposes. The case will then proceed on the basis of the petition as amended by operation of this order. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KASEEM J. WINN, 12 No. 2:13-cv-2111 KJM AC P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 FRED FOULK, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 18, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The 27 court writes separately to emphasize that although the magistrate judge specifically noted the 28 absence of evidence to support petitioner’s assertions of mental illness, see ECF No. 19 at 7, 1 1 petitioner still has not presented evidence to support those assertions. Similarly, petitioner’s 2 objections do not specifically address his mental status during the period between the time his 3 conviction became final and the filing of this action despite the magistrate judge’s findings 4 concerning the relevance of this time period and the absence of such information from the record. 5 Cf. ECF No. 19 at 7. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 18, 2015 (ECF No. 19), are adopted 8 9 in full; 2. Petitioner’s request for a stay (ECF No. 16) is denied; 10 3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is granted; and 11 4. Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition, including exhausted claims only, 12 within 28 days of service of this order. Should petitioner fail to file an amended and fully 13 exhausted petition, the claims identified in the findings and recommendations as unexhausted 14 (ECF No. 19) will be stricken and those portions of the petition disregarded for all purposes. The 15 case will then proceed on the basis of the petition as amended by operation of this order. 16 DATED: March 20, 2015 17 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?