Winn v. McDonald
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/20/2016 ORDERING that the 19 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Petitioner's 16 request for a stay is DENIED. Respondent's 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition, including exhausted claims only, within 28 days of service of this order. Should petitioner fail to file an amended and fully exhausted petition, the claims identified in the 19 findings and recommendations as unexhausted will be stricken and those portions of the petition disregarded for all purposes. The case will then proceed on the basis of the petition as amended by operation of this order. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KASEEM J. WINN,
12
No. 2:13-cv-2111 KJM AC P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
FRED FOULK,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a writ of
18
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On February 18, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
26
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The
27
court writes separately to emphasize that although the magistrate judge specifically noted the
28
absence of evidence to support petitioner’s assertions of mental illness, see ECF No. 19 at 7,
1
1
petitioner still has not presented evidence to support those assertions. Similarly, petitioner’s
2
objections do not specifically address his mental status during the period between the time his
3
conviction became final and the filing of this action despite the magistrate judge’s findings
4
concerning the relevance of this time period and the absence of such information from the record.
5
Cf. ECF No. 19 at 7.
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 18, 2015 (ECF No. 19), are adopted
8
9
in full;
2. Petitioner’s request for a stay (ECF No. 16) is denied;
10
3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is granted; and
11
4. Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition, including exhausted claims only,
12
within 28 days of service of this order. Should petitioner fail to file an amended and fully
13
exhausted petition, the claims identified in the findings and recommendations as unexhausted
14
(ECF No. 19) will be stricken and those portions of the petition disregarded for all purposes. The
15
case will then proceed on the basis of the petition as amended by operation of this order.
16
DATED: March 20, 2015
17
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?