Edwards v. Hsieh, et al.

Filing 27

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/15/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 24 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 19 Motion to Dismiss; ORDERING Defendant Zamora to file an Answer within fourteen days. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID E. EDWARDS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-02113 GEB KJN P (TEMP) Plaintiff, v. ORDER HSIEH, et al, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 22, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 24 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 25 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 26 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 27 28 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 1 1 ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 22, 2016, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendant’s Zamora’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19) is denied; and 4 3. Defendant Zamora shall file an Answer within fourteen days from the date of this 5 order. 6 Dated: June 15, 2016 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?