Hollis v. Bal et al
Filing
115
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 08/05/22 ADOPTING 101 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 87 Motion for Injunctive Relief.(Licea Chavez, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC)
v.
ORDER
J. BAL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On April 27, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within
22
fourteen (14) days. ECF No. 101. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and
23
recommendations. ECF No. 103.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2022, ECF No. 101, are ADOPTED
3
in full; and
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, ECF No. 87, is DENIED.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: August 4, 2022
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?