Hollis v. Bal et al

Filing 210

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/18/2023 GRANTING 209 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall file a Response to 208 Order to Show Cause and file Opposition/Statement of Non-Opposition to 206 Motion Terminating Sanctions by 1/2/24. (Woodson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME v. J. BAL, et al., ECF No. 209 Defendants. RESPONSE DUE JANUARY 2, 2024 17 18 Defendants filed a renewed motion for terminating sanctions, and when plaintiff did not 19 file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days, I ordered him to show 20 cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to comply with court 21 orders. ECF No. 208. Plaintiff now seeks additional time to file a response to the court’s order to 22 show cause. ECF No. 209. Plaintiff states that he did mail his opposition, although the docket 23 indicates that the court never received it. Id. at 2. I will grant plaintiff until January 2, 2024, to 24 file both his response to the order to show cause and either an opposition or statement of non- 25 opposition to defendants’ motion for terminating sanctions. 26 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 27 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 209, is granted. 28 2. Plaintiff shall file by January 2, 2024, both his response to the court’s order to show 1 1 cause and either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion for 2 terminating sanctions. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: December 18, 2023 6 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?