Espey v. Deuel Vocational Institution

Filing 108

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/8/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff is granted 14 days from the date of this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure to file a pretrial statement; The order directing defendants to file their pretrial statement on or before June 16, 2016 is vacated; the court will re-set this date following receipt of plaintiffs briefing, if appropriate.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FLOYD ESPEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2: 13-cv-2147 TLN KJN P

v.

ORDER

DEUEL VOCATIONAL INSTITUTION,
et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action

18
19

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is set for jury trial before the Honorable Troy L.

20

Nunley on August 29, 2016.
Pursuant to the scheduling order filed January 7, 2016, plaintiff’s pretrial statement was

21
22

due on June 2, 2016. Plaintiff did not file his pretrial statement.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. Plaintiff is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to show cause why this

25

action should not be dismissed based on his failure to file a pretrial statement;

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

2. The order directing defendants to file their pretrial statement on or before June 16,

2

2016 is vacated; the court will re-set this date following receipt of plaintiff’s briefing, if

3

appropriate.

4

Dated: June 8, 2016

5
6
7
8
Es2147.osc
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2