California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Guntert Sales & Zimmerman et al

Filing 6

STIPULATION and ORDER 5 for extension of time signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/4/2014. Service of all defendants shall be deemed effective 2/17/2014. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before 3/29/2014. Parties shall file a Joint Status Report with Court no later than 4/21/2014. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Robert J. Tuerck, State Bar No. 255741 JACKSON & TUERCK 429 Main Street, Suite C P.O. Box 148 Quincy, CA 95971 Tel: (530) 283-0406 Fax: (530) 283-0416 E-mail: bob@jacksontuerck.com Andrew L. Packard, State Bar Number 168690 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 100 Petaluma Boulevard, Suite 301 Petaluma, CA 94952 Tel: (707) 763-7227 Fax: (707) 763-9227 E-mail: Andrew@PackardLawOffices.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a nonprofit corporation 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 22 GUNTERT SALES & ZIMMERMAN, et.al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13−CV−02196−MCE−CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 23 Defendants, 24 The parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate that each of the named 25 defendants, and their counsel, have received copies of the summons, the complaint, and the 26 court’s October 21, 2013 Order Requiring Joint Status Report to in the above captioned matter, 27 and seek to establish a date certain for Defendants to file a responsive pleading. 28 STIPULATION REGARDING SERVICE AND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 1 1 The Complaint in this action was filed on October 21, 2013. Defendants have been 2 aware of the Complaint since October 23, 2013, and a copy of the Complaint was sent by email 3 to Defendants’ counsel on October 24, 2013. The parties acknowledge that Defendants have 4 had actual notice of the lawsuit since October 23, 2013. Defendants further agree to waive 5 service of summons in keeping with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) and 12(a)(1)(A)(ii). 6 7 8 9 The parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions, and have already participated in an informal, settlement-protected site inspection. The parties are continuing to make progress on their settlement discussions and desire additional time to focus their resources on resolving 10 this case. As such, the parties stipulate that the undersigned counsel for Defendants will accept 11 service for all defendants effective February 17, 2014, which is within the 120 day period 12 prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The parties further stipulate that Defendants’ responsive 13 14 pleading shall be ordered filed on or before March 29, 2014. The parties respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation and sign the order 15 16 17 below reflecting the dates set forth herein. SO STIPULATED. 18 Respectfully Submitted, 19 DATED: January 28, 2014 20 JACKSON & TUERCK /s/ Robert J. Tuerck Robert J. Tuerck Attorney for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 DATED: January 29, 2014 VERNON LAW OFFICE /s/ __Cecelia Fusich_________ By: Cecelia C. Fusich Attorney for Defendants GUNTERT SALES & ZIMMERMAN, GUNTERT STEEL, and RONALD M. GUNTERT 28 STIPULATION REGARDING SERVICE AND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 2 ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Based upon the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore: 1. Service on all Defendants shall be deemed effective February 17, 2014; 2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before March 29, 2014; and 3. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report with the court no later Monday, April 6 7 8 9 10 21, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2014 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING SERVICE AND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?