Lujan v. Placer Superior Court
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/31/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED and administratively closed. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL LUJAN,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-02205 DAD P
v.
ORDER
PLACER SUPERIOR COURT,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a Placer County Jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of
17
18
habeas corpus. In his petition it appears that petitioner is awaiting trial on criminal charges in
19
state court and had disagreed with his defense counsel in that criminal matter over the waiving of
20
his right to a speedy trial. However, seven days after petitioner filed his habeas petition in this
21
court, he filed a letter requesting that this habeas action be dismissed purportedly because he had
22
been by the trial judge presiding over his prosecution in state court that time had not been waived
23
for trial in his case. (ECF No. 3.)
Accordingly, petitioner’s request will be granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this
24
25
action be dismissed and administratively closed.
26
Dated: October 31, 2013
27
28
DAD:4
1
1
luj2205.159
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?