Lujan v. Placer Superior Court

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/31/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED and administratively closed. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL LUJAN, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-02205 DAD P v. ORDER PLACER SUPERIOR COURT, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a Placer County Jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of 17 18 habeas corpus. In his petition it appears that petitioner is awaiting trial on criminal charges in 19 state court and had disagreed with his defense counsel in that criminal matter over the waiving of 20 his right to a speedy trial. However, seven days after petitioner filed his habeas petition in this 21 court, he filed a letter requesting that this habeas action be dismissed purportedly because he had 22 been by the trial judge presiding over his prosecution in state court that time had not been waived 23 for trial in his case. (ECF No. 3.) Accordingly, petitioner’s request will be granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this 24 25 action be dismissed and administratively closed. 26 Dated: October 31, 2013 27 28 DAD:4 1 1 luj2205.159 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?