Lujan v. Placer Superior Court

Filing 9

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/06/14 ORDERING the clerk of the court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL LUJAN,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:13-cv-02205 DAD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant.

16
17

By an order filed November 12, 2013, this action was re-opened and plaintiff was ordered

18

to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. Plaintiff

19

was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be

20

dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s

21

order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to
randomly assign this case to a District Judge.

24

Also, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

28

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1

1

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

2

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

3

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

4

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: January 6, 2014

6
7
8

DAD:4
luj2205.fifp

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2