Hall v. Grammatico et al
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/24/14 denying as unnecessary 20 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN M. HALL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-CV-2211-CMK-P
vs.
ORDER
ANTHONY GRAMMATICO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. 20),
19
together with a proposed amended complaint (Doc. 21). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
20
Procedure 15(a)(1), a party may amend his pleading once as a matter of right at any time before
21
being served with a responsive pleading. A review of the docket reflects that no responsive
22
pleading has been served. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion is denied as unnecessary. This action
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
1
1
shall now proceed on the amended complaint, which supercedes the prior complaint. The
2
adequacy of the amended complaint will be addressed by separate order.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
DATED: July 24, 2014
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?