Hall v. Grammatico et al

Filing 83

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/20/17 denying 80 Motion for an in-person case management conference. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN M. HALL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-CV-2211-KJM-CMK-P

vs.

ORDER

ANTHONY GRAMMATICO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

/

17

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to

18

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 80) for the court to set an

19

in-person case management conference. According to plaintiff, he has various discovery related

20

issues he wishes to discuss with defendants’ counsel. Plaintiff has not shown good cause for

21

court intervention at this time, nor has plaintiff demonstrated the need for an in-person hearing.

22

Should court intervention be required to resolve a discovery dispute, plaintiff must file a written

23

motion pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, issued herewith.

24

///

25

///

26

///
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 80) for an
in–person case management conference is denied.

3
4
5
6

DATED: January 20, 2017
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2