Petitjean v. Novo Nordisk Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/11/2013 GRANTING 7 Motion to Remand; REMANDED CASE to Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento. Copy of remand order sent. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LISA PETITJEAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 13-cv-02223 TLN-DAD v. ORDER NOVO NORDISK INC., MARGO VOLPE, and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Lisa Petijean’s motion to remand to 18 19 Sacramento County Superior Court. (See Pl.’s Mot. to Remand, ECF 7.) Defendant Novo 20 Nordisk, Inc. (“Defendant”) has filed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to 21 remand. (See Def.’s Statement of Non-Opp’n, ECF 13.) Defendant removed this case from Sacramento County Superior Court to this court on 22 23 October 13, 2013, on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. (Def.’s Notice of Removal, ECF 24 1.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on November 05, 2013, omitting the federal claims 25 asserted in Plaintiff’s original complaint. (Pl.’s First Am. Compl., ECF 6) 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Because the operative complaint is now devoid of any federal claims, and because 2 Defendant does not oppose remand, Plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED. This case is 3 hereby remanded to Sacramento County Superior Court. The clerk of the court is directed to 4 close the case. 5 Dated: December 11, 2013 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?