Inthavongxay v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/21/2015 GRANTING 26 Motion to Compel Rule 26 Disclosures; ORDERING the plaintiff to provide the disclosures to the defendant by the close of business on 3/23/2015; CAUTIONING the plaintiff that the failure to comply with this order will result in the imposition of sanctions. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLET INTHAVONGXAY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-2249 WBS DAD

v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

15

Defendant.

16
On March 20, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of defendant’s

17
18

motion to compel. Attorney Russell Robinson appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff

19

and attorney Ariana Van Alstine appeared on behalf of the defendant.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set

20
21

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1. Defendant’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 26) is granted; and

23

2. Plaintiff shall provide the disclosures to defendant by close of business Monday March

24

23, 2015. Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to comply with this order will result in the

25

imposition of sanctions.

26

Dated: March 21, 2015

27
28

DAD:6

1

1

Ddad1\orders.civil\inthavongxay2249.oah.032015.docx

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2