Spradlin v. Kasco Corporation

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/2014 ORDERING the defendant to respond to the 21 Second Amended Complaint by 4/11/2014; STAYING these proceedings pending the Court's consideration of the anticipated Motion for Approval of Settlement. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 LAURA J. FOWLER (Bar No. 186097) laura.fowler@bbklaw.com Best Best & Krieger LLP 500 Capitol Mall Suite 1700 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 325-4000 Facsimile: (916) 325-4010 5 6 7 8 PAUL H. SINCLAIR (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) paul.sinclair@icemiller.com Ice Miller LLP One American Square, Suite 2900 Indianapolis, IN 46282 Telephone: (317) 236-2176 Facsimile: (317) 592-4759 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant Kasco Corporation 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 ANTHONY SPRADLIN, an individual, GARY ALLEN, an individual, and DAVID SAMUELSON, an individual, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 Case No. 2:13-cv-02260-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS v. 18 19 KASCO CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. FOR 2ND EXT. OF TIME 2:13-CV-02260-TLN-AC Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties hereby stipulate as follows: 2 Laura J. Fowler, Best Best & Kreiger, LLP, and Paul H. Sinclair, Ice Miller LLP, 3 attorneys for defendant, Kasco Corporation (“Defendant”) and Rory C. Quintana, Quintana 4 Albert LLP, attorney for plaintiffs, Anthony Spradlin, Gary Allen, and David Samuelson, hereby 5 stipulate to a three-week extension for Defendant to respond to the Second Amended Complaint 6 filed in this matter on February 28, 2014. The parties have mediated this matter, reached a 7 settlement, and filed a notice of settlement. The parties are in the process of submitting a request 8 to the Court for approval of the settlement and dismissal of this action (under a request to file 9 documents under seal). A response to the Second Amended Complaint is due on or about March 10 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 1 21, 2014. Given the pendency of the settlement and the imminent request for Court approval, the 11 parties have agreed to postpone the deadline for responding to the Second Amended Complaint to 12 April 11, 2014. The parties have also agreed to temporarily stay these proceedings pending the 13 Court’s consideration of the anticipated motion for approval of the settlement, so that neither 14 party propounds discovery or is obligated to comply with any previously established deadlines 15 unrelated to the request for Court approval of the settlement. 16 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 21, 2014 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 18 By: 19 20 /s/Laura J. Fowler LAURA J. FOWLER Attorneys for Defendant Kasco Corporation 21 22 Dated: March 21, 2014 ICE MILLER LLP 23 By: 24 25 /s/Paul H. Sinclair PAUL H. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendant Kasco Corporation 26 27 28 1 STIP. FOR 2ND EXT. OF TIME 2:13-CV-02260-TLN-AC 1 Dated: March 21, 2014 QUINTANA ALBERT LLP 2 BY: /s/Rory C. Quintana RORY C. QUINTANA Attorneys for Plaintiff Anthony Spradlin 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: March 27, 2014 9 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- X 2:13-CV-02260-TLN-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?