Spradlin v. Kasco Corporation
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/19/2013 ORDERING that an initial three-week extension for Defendant to respond to the complaint is GRANTED. Defendant's response is now due on 12/13/2013. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
LAURA J. FOWLER, Bar No. 186097
laura.fowler@bbklaw.com
Best Best & Krieger LLP
500 Capitol Mall
Suite 1700
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 325-4000
Facsimile: (916) 325-4010
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
Kasco Corporation
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY SPRADLIN, an individual,
12
Plaintiff,
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FIRST
EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
14
Case No. 2:13-cv-02260-TLN-AC
KASCO CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2:13-CV-02260-TLN-AC
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties hereby stipulate as follows:
2
Laura J. Fowler, Best Best & Kreiger, LLP, attorney for defendant, Kasco Corporation
3
(“Defendant”) and Rory C. Quintana, Quintana & Albert LLP, attorney for plaintiff, Anthony
4
Spradlin, hereby stipulate to an initial three-week extension for Defendant to respond to the
5
complaint filed in this matter. Defendant’s response is now due on December 13, 2013.
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November 19, 2013
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
8
By:
9
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
10
/s/Laura J. Fowler
LAURA J. FOWLER
Attorneys for Defendant
Kasco Corporation
11
12
Dated: November 19, 2013
QUINTANA & ALBERT LLP
13
BY:
/s/Rory C. Quintana
RORY C. QUINTANA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Anthony Spradlin
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated: November 19, 2013
20
21
22
23
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIP AND ORDER FOR 1ST EXT. OF TIME
2:13-CV-02260-TLN-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?