Synthes, Inc. et al v. Knapp

Filing 49

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/12/15: If the Court denies the 46 Motion, then fact discovery will be extended until sixty days from the date of that Order; or if the Court grants the Motion, then fact discovery will be extended until eighty days from the date of that Order. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 BLANK ROME LLP Howard M. Knee (SBN 55048) 2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 424.239.3400 Facsimile: 424.239.3434 BLANK ROME LLP Anthony Haller (admitted pro hac vice) Scott F. Cooper (admitted pro hac vice) Andrew B. Cohen (admitted pro hac vice) One Logan Square 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: 215.569.5690 Facsimile: 215.832.5690 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Synthes, Inc. and DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. SEGAL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. John T. Kinn (SBN 130270) 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2550 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.441.0886 17 THE MCSHEA LAW FIRM John P. McShea (admitted pro hac vice) 1500 Market Street Center Square, Suite 4000 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Telephone: 215.599.0800 Facsimile: 215.599.0888 18 Attorneys for Defendant Gregory Knapp 14 15 16 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 24 25 26 SYNTHES, INC. AND DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC., Plaintiffs / Counterclaim-Defendants, vs. Case No. 2:13-cv-02261-MCE-DAD STIPULATED ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER GREGORY KNAPP, Defendant / Counterclaim-Plaintiff. 27 28 STIPULATED ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 090725.02356/12480970V.4 1 WHEREAS, on September 4, 2014, the Court entered a Pretrial Scheduling 2 Order (the “Scheduling Order”), scheduling a fact discovery deadline of April 22, 3 2015 (ECF No. 41); 4 WHEREAS, on January 29, 2015, DePuy Synthes filed its Motion to Compel 5 Production of Documents from Third-Party K2M, Inc. (the “Motion”), which is 6 noticed to be heard on February 20, 2015. (ECF No. 46); 7 WHEREAS, on February 3, 2015, all parties and third-party K2M met and 8 conferred regarding rescheduling depositions in this matter until after resolution of 9 DePuy Synthes’ Motion; 10 11 12 13 14 WHEREAS this is the first request for an extension of any deadlines in the Scheduling Order; WHEREAS, the parties’ request for an extension of the fact discovery deadline will not affect any other deadlines in the Scheduling Order; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties STIPULATE and AGREE to amend the 15 Order to extend the deadline for fact discovery as follows: (i) if the Court denies the 16 Motion, then fact discovery will be extended until sixty days from the date of that 17 Order; or (ii) if the Court grants the Motion, then fact discovery will be extended until 18 eighty days1 from the date of that Order. If any party or non-party objects to or seeks 19 reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations pursuant to 20 Local Rules 303 or 304, then these deadlines will be tolled until such objections or 21 requests for reconsideration are resolved. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The additional twenty (20) days of discovery corresponds to the amount of time that would be afforded to K2M, Inc. if the Court grants the relief requested in the proposed order accompanying DePuy Synthes’ Motion. (ECF No. 46-1) 090725.02356/12480970v.4 2 PROPOSED STIPULATED ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER IT IS SO STIPULATED: 1 2 3 BLANK ROME LLP SEGAL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 4 By: By: 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Scott F. Cooper Anthony B. Haller Howard M. Knee Scott F. Cooper Andrew B. Cohen THE MCSHEA LAW FIRM By: Attorneys for Plaintiffs Synthes, Inc. and DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. 12 13 /s/ John P. McShea John P. McShea Attorneys for Defendant Gregory Knapp 10 11 /s/ John T. Kinn John T. Kinn IT IS SO ORDERED: DATED: FEBRUARY 12, 2015 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 090725.02356/12480970v.4 2 PROPOSED STIPULATED ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?