Synthes, Inc. et al v. Knapp
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/6/15 ORDERING that 46 Motion to Compel is granted as more fully stated on the record. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SYNTHES, INC. AND DEPUY
SYNTHES SALES, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-2261 MCE DAD
GREGORY KNAPP,
Defendant.
16
17
On February 20, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiffs’
18
motion to compel. Attorneys Scott Cooper and Andrew Cohen appeared in person on behalf of
19
the plaintiffs. Attorney John McShea appeared telephonically on behalf of the defendant and
20
attorney John Kim appeared in person also on behalf of the defendant. Attorney Shannon
21
Sutherland appeared in person on behalf of third party K2M, Inc.
22
/////
23
/////
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set
2
forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to compel
3
(Dkt. No. 46) is granted as more fully stated on the record.1
4
Dated: March 6, 2015
5
6
7
8
Ddad1\orders.civil
synthes2261.oah.022015
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
In particular, the production of Mr. Knapp’s commission statements and sales data shall be
limited to two year’ prior to his employment with K2M, Inc., to the present.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?