Gilliam v. City of West Sacramento et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/8/2014 ORDERING 15 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the 12(b) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants City of West Sacramento and Dan Drummond is HEREBY taken off calendar and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a second amended complaint. (Reader, L)
1
5
JAMES C. ASHWORTH, SBN 151272
THE ASHWORTH LAW OFFICE
1105 Kennedy Place, Suite 8
Davis, California 95616
Telephone: (530) 574-1130
Facsimile: (530) 564-4987
Email:
jim@theashworthlawoffice.com
6
Attorney for Plaintiff ROCHELLE L. GILLIAM
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ROCHELLE L. GILLIAM,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
Case No.: 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO,
SERGIO ALVAREZ, DAN
DRUMMOND, and DOES 1 through 25,
Defendants.
Judge: The Hon. William B. Shubb
18
19
20
21
COMES NOW Plaintiff ROCHELLE L. GILLIAM (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and requests
22
that this Court issue an order permitting Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint and take
23
the 12(b) motion to dismiss, scheduled to be heard on April 21, 2014, off calendar.
24
The initial complaint in this matter was filed on November 1, 2013. Pursuant to the
25
Court’s ruling, a first amended complaint was thereafter required solely to replace the “JANE
26
DOE” pseudonym with Plaintiff GILLIAM’S true name. The first amended complaint was filed
27
on November 21, 2013.
28
1
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC
1
Defendant ALVAREZ answered the first amended complaint on March 4, 2013.
2
Defendants CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND filed their initial
3
appearance in the form of a 12(b) motion to dismiss on March 11, 2014. This motion is presently
4
calendared to be heard on April 21, 2014.
5
Counsel for the parties have met and conferred on the matter and have concluded that
6
rather than have the Court hear the 12(b) motion presently on calendar, then have Plaintiff file a
7
second amended complaint, and thereafter have a second 12(b) motion; it would save time and
8
resources to have the presently calendared motion taken off calendar, have Plaintiff file her
9
amended complaint and then have a single 12(b) motion, if necessary.
10
Based on the foregoing, the parties have stipulated to have the 12(b) motion to dismiss
11
filed by Defendants CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND taken off
12
calendar and, with the Court’s permission, grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended
13
complaint.
14
15
Dated: April 1, 2014
THE ASHWORTH LAW OFFICE
16
17
___/s/ James C. Ashworth_____________________
JAMES C. ASHWORTH
Attorney for Plaintiff
18
19
20
Dated: April 7, 2014
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
21
____/s/ Bruce A. Kilday______________________
BRUCE A. KILDAY
Attorney for Defendants CITY OF WEST
SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 7, 2014
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
2
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC
1
_____/s/ John A. Lavra_______________________
JOHN A. LAVRA
Attorney for Defendant SERGIO ALVAREZ
2
3
4
5
6
ORDER
7
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the 12(b) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants
8
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND is hereby taken off calendar and
9
Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED
12
13
14
Dated: April 8, 2014
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?