Gilliam v. City of West Sacramento et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/8/2014 ORDERING 15 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the 12(b) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants City of West Sacramento and Dan Drummond is HEREBY taken off calendar and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a second amended complaint. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 5 JAMES C. ASHWORTH, SBN 151272 THE ASHWORTH LAW OFFICE 1105 Kennedy Place, Suite 8 Davis, California 95616 Telephone: (530) 574-1130 Facsimile: (530) 564-4987 Email: jim@theashworthlawoffice.com 6 Attorney for Plaintiff ROCHELLE L. GILLIAM 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ROCHELLE L. GILLIAM, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 v. Case No.: 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, SERGIO ALVAREZ, DAN DRUMMOND, and DOES 1 through 25, Defendants. Judge: The Hon. William B. Shubb 18 19 20 21 COMES NOW Plaintiff ROCHELLE L. GILLIAM (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and requests 22 that this Court issue an order permitting Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint and take 23 the 12(b) motion to dismiss, scheduled to be heard on April 21, 2014, off calendar. 24 The initial complaint in this matter was filed on November 1, 2013. Pursuant to the 25 Court’s ruling, a first amended complaint was thereafter required solely to replace the “JANE 26 DOE” pseudonym with Plaintiff GILLIAM’S true name. The first amended complaint was filed 27 on November 21, 2013. 28 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC 1 Defendant ALVAREZ answered the first amended complaint on March 4, 2013. 2 Defendants CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND filed their initial 3 appearance in the form of a 12(b) motion to dismiss on March 11, 2014. This motion is presently 4 calendared to be heard on April 21, 2014. 5 Counsel for the parties have met and conferred on the matter and have concluded that 6 rather than have the Court hear the 12(b) motion presently on calendar, then have Plaintiff file a 7 second amended complaint, and thereafter have a second 12(b) motion; it would save time and 8 resources to have the presently calendared motion taken off calendar, have Plaintiff file her 9 amended complaint and then have a single 12(b) motion, if necessary. 10 Based on the foregoing, the parties have stipulated to have the 12(b) motion to dismiss 11 filed by Defendants CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND taken off 12 calendar and, with the Court’s permission, grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended 13 complaint. 14 15 Dated: April 1, 2014 THE ASHWORTH LAW OFFICE 16 17 ___/s/ James C. Ashworth_____________________ JAMES C. ASHWORTH Attorney for Plaintiff 18 19 20 Dated: April 7, 2014 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP 21 ____/s/ Bruce A. Kilday______________________ BRUCE A. KILDAY Attorney for Defendants CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 7, 2014 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC 1 _____/s/ John A. Lavra_______________________ JOHN A. LAVRA Attorney for Defendant SERGIO ALVAREZ 2 3 4 5 6 ORDER 7 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the 12(b) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants 8 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and DAN DRUMMOND is hereby taken off calendar and 9 Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED 12 13 14 Dated: April 8, 2014 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 2:13-CV-02276-WBS-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?