Nguy v. Cinch Bakery Equipment, LLC et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/21/2015 GRANTING 31 Request for Telephonic Appearance at the Motion Hearing on 27 Motion to Strike, 28 Motion for Sanctions set for 5/28/2015 at 10:00 AM; DIRECTING Defendants' counsel, Aaron P. Rudin, to be available by telephone at (213) 576-5085 at least ten minutes prior to the scheduled hearing time. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
CALVIN E. DAVIS (SBN: 101640)
AARON P. RUDIN (SBN: 223004)
GORDON & REES LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5200
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 576-5000
Facsimile: (213) 680-4470
E-mail: cdavis@gordonrees.com;
arudin@gordonrees.com
Attorneys for Defendants CINCH BAKERY
EQUIPMENT, LLC and CINDY CHANANIE
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
Gordon & Rees LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5200
Los Angeles, CA 90071
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DINH NGUY,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
CINCH BAKERY EQUIPMENT, LLC;
)
CINDY CHANANIE; BACKTECHNIC S.I.; )
GERD MANG; and JOHN and JANE DOES 1- )
10,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-02283-TLN-KJN
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[Request for Telephonic Appearance At
Hearing on Pending Cross-Motions filed
concurrently herewith.]
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
May 28, 2015
10:00 a.m.
25, 8th Floor
Hon. Kendall J. Newman
19
20
The court hereby approves the Request for Telephonic Appearance by counsel for
21
Defendants Cinch Bakery Equipment LLC and Cindy Chananie, to appear at the hearing on the
22
pending cross-motions in the above-captioned matter, scheduled for May 28, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.
23
Counsel for Defendants, Aaron P. Rudin, is directed to be available by telephone at (213) 576-
24
5085 at least ten minutes prior to the scheduling hearing time.
25
Dated: May 21, 2015
26
27
28
1092472/23594849v.1
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-02283 TLN-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?