Nguy v. Cinch Bakery Equipment, LLC et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/21/2015 GRANTING 31 Request for Telephonic Appearance at the Motion Hearing on 27 Motion to Strike, 28 Motion for Sanctions set for 5/28/2015 at 10:00 AM; DIRECTING Defendants' counsel, Aaron P. Rudin, to be available by telephone at (213) 576-5085 at least ten minutes prior to the scheduled hearing time. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 CALVIN E. DAVIS (SBN: 101640) AARON P. RUDIN (SBN: 223004) GORDON & REES LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 576-5000 Facsimile: (213) 680-4470 E-mail: cdavis@gordonrees.com; arudin@gordonrees.com Attorneys for Defendants CINCH BAKERY EQUIPMENT, LLC and CINDY CHANANIE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DINH NGUY, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) CINCH BAKERY EQUIPMENT, LLC; ) CINDY CHANANIE; BACKTECHNIC S.I.; ) GERD MANG; and JOHN and JANE DOES 1- ) 10, ) ) ) Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-02283-TLN-KJN [PROPOSED] ORDER [Request for Telephonic Appearance At Hearing on Pending Cross-Motions filed concurrently herewith.] Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: May 28, 2015 10:00 a.m. 25, 8th Floor Hon. Kendall J. Newman 19 20 The court hereby approves the Request for Telephonic Appearance by counsel for 21 Defendants Cinch Bakery Equipment LLC and Cindy Chananie, to appear at the hearing on the 22 pending cross-motions in the above-captioned matter, scheduled for May 28, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. 23 Counsel for Defendants, Aaron P. Rudin, is directed to be available by telephone at (213) 576- 24 5085 at least ten minutes prior to the scheduling hearing time. 25 Dated: May 21, 2015 26 27 28 1092472/23594849v.1 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-02283 TLN-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?