Murphy v. United States Forest Service, et al.

Filing 81

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/23/16 ORDERING that the date for defendants' opposition and cross-motion is CONTINUED to 02/25/16; all other dates remain unchanged. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 DENNIS D. MURPHY Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service; and NANCY J. GIBSON, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the United States Forest Service, Defendants CASE NO. 13-cv-02315-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 15 16 To further promote the parties' efforts toward resolution, and in the interest of judicial economy, 17 the parties hereby stipulate and propose that the due date for Defendants' opposition and cross-motion be 18 continued to February 25, 2016. All other dates remain unchanged. Resolution, if achievable, will save 19 the parties and the Court significant resources, and there is thus good cause for this brief continuance. 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 DATED: February 19, 2016 22 By 23 /s/ Paul S. Weiland (auth. 2/19/16) Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 24 By: 25 26 /s/ Gregory T. Broderick GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney 27 28 29 30 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 1 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: February 23, 2016 4 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?