Davis v. Midland Funding, LLC et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/18/14 ORDERING that the motion to compel discovery from the Brachfeld defendants 47 is granted in part. No later than 12/31/14, Defendant Erica Brachfeld shall provide unredacted versions o f the 21 documents previously produced, provide a supplemental response to requests for production of documents nos. 6, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21, 22, 23, and provide an unqualified admission or denial to request for admission no. 3. The motion to compel dis covery from the Midland defendants 46 is granted in part. No later than 12/31/14, the Midland defendants shall provide supplemental responses to interrogatories nos. 6 and 8 as agreed in the joint statement and to interrogatory no. 12, provide a s upplemental response to requests for production of documents nos. 10, 11 and 26-31, provide a supplemental production to request for production nos. 12-23, provide an unqualified admission or denial requests for admission nos. 3 and 4, and produce for in camera review in bate-stamped format the Purchase and Sale Agreement relevant to this action. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LARRY DEAN DAVIS,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-2316 KJM CKD

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff’s motions to compel came on regularly for hearing on December 17, 2014.

18

Raeon Roulston appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Sarah Schienhorn appeared telephonically

19

for the Midland defendants. Erica Brachfeld appeared telephonically for the Brachfeld

20

defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the

21

arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS

22

FOLLOWS:

23
24
25

1. The motion to compel discovery from the Brachfeld defendants (ECF No. 47) is
granted in part. No later than December 31, 2014:
a. Defendant Erica Brachfeld shall provide unredacted versions of the 21

26

documents previously produced, subject to the protective order previously entered in this action;

27

provide a supplemental response to requests for production of documents nos. 6, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21,

28

22, 23 stating that all documents responsive to these requests have been produced; and provide an
1

1
2
3

unqualified admission or denial to request for admission no. 3.
2. The motion to compel discovery from the Midland defendants (ECF No. 46) is granted
in part. No later than December 31, 2014, the Midland defendants shall:

4
5

a. Provide supplemental responses to interrogatories nos. 6 and 8 as agreed in the
joint statement and to interrogatory no. 12, as limited by plaintiff in the joint statement;

6

b. Provide a supplemental response to requests for production of documents nos.

7

10, 11 and 26-31 stating that all documents responsive to these requests have been produced;

8

c. Provide a supplemental production to request for production nos. 12-23, as

9

limited by plaintiff in the joint statement;

10
11

d. Provide an unqualified admission or denial requests for admission nos.
3 and 4;

12

e. Produce for in camera review in bate-stamped format the Purchase and Sale

13

Agreement relevant to this action.

14

Dated: December 18, 2014

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18

4 davis-midland.oah

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2