Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company v. Chiang

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/3/2014 ORDERING 19 the parties shall have until 3/28/2014 to submit their joint status report. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Richard J. Chivaro (SBN 124391) OFFICE OF THE STATE CONTROLLER 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1850 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 445-6854 Facsimile: (916) 322-1220 Email: rchivaro@sco.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant, JOHN CHIANG, in his official capacity as CONTROLLER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 FIDELITY & GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 JOHN CHIANG, in his official capacity as CONTROLLER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 17 18 ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-02317-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT Exempt from Fees (Gov. Code § 6103) Complaint Filed: November 6, 2013 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT 1 Plaintiff Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company (“Plaintiff” or “FGL”) and Defendant 2 John Chiang, in his official capacity as Controller of the State of California (“Defendant” or the 3 “Controller”), by and through their counsel, stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing its Complaint on November 6, 2013; 5 WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Complaint on November 7, 2013; 6 WHEREAS, the Court entered an Order Requiring Joint Status Report (Docket No. 5, the 7 “Status Report Order”) on November 7, 2013; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, the Status Report Order requires the parties to prepare and submit to the Court a joint status report that includes their Rule 26(f) discovery plan within sixty (60) days of service of the Complaint; 11 WHEREAS, in this case, the parties’ joint status report is due on or before January 7, 2014; 12 WHEREAS, Defendant has obtained approval from the California Attorney General to retain 13 outside counsel to represent the Controller in this case pursuant to California Government Code § 14 11040; 15 16 17 WHEREAS, the Controller needed additional time to respond to the Complaint, whether through his preferred counsel or otherwise; WHEREAS, FGL and the Controller stipulated to a continuance of the Controller’s deadline 18 to respond to the Complaint, continuing the deadline to January 15, 2014 by way of written 19 stipulation filed with the Court on November 26, 2013 (Docket No. 15, the “First Stipulation”); 20 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, the Court approved the First Stipulation by its Order entered on November 27, 2013 (Docket No. 16); WHEREAS, an issue regarding an alleged conflict of interest regarding the Controller’s counsel of choice arose and remains the subject of ongoing discussion between the parties; WHEREAS, the parties determined that the ongoing discussions necessitated another extension of time for the Controller to respond to the Complaint; 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT 1 WHEREAS, on December 19, 2013, the parties executed and filed a joint stipulation 2 providing Defendant an extension to and including March 14, 2014 to file a response to the 3 Complaint (Docket No. 17, the “Second Stipulation”); 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the Court approved the Second Stipulation by its Order entered on December 20, 2013 (Docket No. 18) WHEREAS, because the discussions regarding an alleged conflict are ongoing, the Controller has not yet been able to retain his counsel of choice; WHEREAS, because the discussions regarding the alleged conflict involving the Controller’s counsel of choice are ongoing, the parties agree that additional time is needed for analysis and evaluation before the Controller can make a decision regarding his choice of counsel in this matter; WHEREAS, in light of the above, and subject to the Court’s approval, the parties have agreed to a continuance of the deadline imposed by the Status Report Order; and WHEREAS, this is the parties’ first request for a continuance of the deadline imposed by the Status Report Order: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the Court’s approval, that the parties shall have 16 until March 28, 2014 to submit the joint status report required by the Status Report Order. In so 17 stipulating, the parties understand and acknowledge that the Controller preserves all rights, remedies, 18 and defenses that he has at this time, including, without limitation, his rights under the United States 19 Constitution (including, without limitation, the Tenth and Eleventh Amendments), the Constitution 20 of the State of California, sovereign immunity and federalism principles, and any and all other 21 applicable law. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT 1 Dated: January 2, 2014 By: /s/Richard J. Chivaro 2 Richard J. Chivaro (SBN 124391) OFFICE OF THE STATE CONTROLLER 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1850 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 445-6854 Facsimile: (916) 322-1220 Email: rchivaro@sco.ca.gov 3 4 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant, JOHN CHIANG, in his official capacity as CONTROLLER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 Dated: January 2, 2014 10 By: /s/David L. Sasseville David L. Sasseville LINDQUIST & VENNUM LLP 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 371-3211 Facsimile: (612) 371-3207 E-mail: dsasseville@lindquist.com 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendant, the parties shall have until 18 March 28, 2014 to submit their joint status report required by the Status Report Order. IT IS SO 19 ORDERED. 20 Dated: January 3, 2014 /s/ John A. Mendez___________ Honorable John A. Mendez 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?