Salazar v. Honest Tea, Inc.
Filing
48
AMENDED STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/17/2015 AMENDING the Jury Trial and Trial Briefs. Trial Briefs Due: 9/5/2016. Jury Trial set for 9/19/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. [All other dates remain pending from 47 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order](Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SARAH A. SALAZAR,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-CV-2318 KJM EFB
v.
AMENDED STATUS (PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING) ORDER
HONEST TEA, INC.,
15
Defendants,
16
17
18
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on March 5, 2015. Annick
19
Persinger and Yeremey Krivoshey appeared for plaintiff; Steven Zalesin appeared for defendant.
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on February 26, 2015, and
20
21
discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following
22
orders:
23
I.
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without
24
25
leave of court, good cause having been shown.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
II.
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
2
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without
3
leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
4
Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
5
III.
JURISDICTION/VENUE
6
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2)(A). Jurisdiction and venue
7
are not disputed.
8
IV.
CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
9
-
Class certification motion deadline: August 27, 2015
10
-
Opposition to class certification motion deadline: October 30, 2015
11
-
Reply in support of class certification deadline: December 2, 2015
12
-
Hearing on motion for class certification: January 15, 2016
13
V.
14
DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) have been
15
completed. By March 19, 2015, the parties shall file a stipulation setting parameters for early
16
class certification discovery and later merits discovery, while recognizing efficiencies to be
17
achieved by some overlapping discovery. All discovery shall be completed by January 22, 2016.
18
In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all
19
depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by
20
appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed.
21
All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in
22
accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews
23
proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge
24
Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge
25
handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order,
26
even in connection with a discovery matter.
27
/////
28
/////
2
1
VI.
2
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other
3
parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial
4
not later than February 26, 2016. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report
5
prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
6
By May 6, 2016, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a
7
supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an
8
expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation
9
has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation
10
shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated
11
above.
12
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
13
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
14
witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
15
the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
16
anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
17
promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
18
available for deposition.
19
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used
20
at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which
21
include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
22
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the
23
case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert
24
for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,
25
retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
26
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state
27
in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.
28
/////
3
1
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
2
an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and
3
complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted
4
to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition
5
taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by June 3, 2016.
6
VII.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
7
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
8
orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than June 17, 2016.1 By setting a
9
cutoff date for motions, the court does not preclude the filing of early summary judgment
10
motions. The parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the
11
court’s website.
12
13
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:
14
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
15
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
16
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
17
Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
18
the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
19
652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
20
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
21
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
22
must be made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of
23
the motion.
24
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
25
counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
26
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
27
28
1
Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4
1
the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
2
considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
3
should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
4
summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
5
by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
6
the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
7
motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and
8
confer efforts.
9
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device
10
designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon
11
dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions
12
in limine. Although all motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial
13
statement, the court will hear only those motions it has identified to counsel before the hearing
14
date.
15
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
16
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
17
date may constitute waiver of such issue.
18
VIII.
19
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
20
prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
21
record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
22
directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
23
governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
24
discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
25
public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
26
sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has
27
identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
28
/////
5
1
opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
2
sealing or redaction from the court.
3
IX.
4
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for August 18, 2016, at 3:30 p.m. At least one
5
of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial
6
Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to
7
attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the
8
case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
9
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final
10
Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of
11
witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference
12
statement by July 28, 2016. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the
13
matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local
14
Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:
15
16
17
- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.
- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.
18
Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to
19
identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of
20
each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.
21
Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core
22
disputed facts in the above manner.
23
24
25
- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s
motion in limine.
- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory
26
underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core
27
undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the
28
parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs.
6
1
- A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the
2
jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to
3
inform the jury what the case is about.
4
- The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case.
5
Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include
6
documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
7
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to
8
attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they
9
propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief
10
statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each
11
party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial
12
Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to
13
the Final Pretrial Order.
14
Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed
15
alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for
16
plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be
17
marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be
18
then listed as A-3, A-4, A-5 etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened
19
together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include
20
excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and
21
defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation
22
the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that
23
all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a
24
number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent
25
possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-
26
1, JX-2.
27
28
The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of
witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the
7
1
standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a
2
party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.
3
4
Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.
5
6
Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
for sanctions.
7
The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of
8
Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the
9
formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)
10
the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof
11
and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference
12
Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.2
13
A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary
14
sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as
15
the court deems appropriate.
16
Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,
17
counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety
18
(including the witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
19
X.
TRIAL SETTING
20
The jury trial is set for September 19, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a
21
trial length of approximately five (5) to fifteen (15) days. Trial briefs are due by September 5,
22
2016.
23
/////
24
/////
25
/////
26
2
27
28
“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed
facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose
of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985).
8
1
XI.
2
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
The parties have expressed interest in appearing for settlement conference.
3
Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney has been randomly selected. A settlement conference is
4
scheduled before Judge Delaney for May 22, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24, 8th Floor.
5
The parties are directed to submit their confidential settlement conference
6
statements to the Court using the following email address: ckdorders@caed.uscourts.gov. If a
7
party desires to share additional confidential information with the Court, they may do so pursuant
8
to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Statements are due at least 7 days prior to the
9
Settlement Conference. Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in
10
person at the settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized to
11
settle the matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270.
12
XII.
13
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
14
Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
15
upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not
16
constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or
17
counsel does not constitute good cause.
18
XIII.
19
20
21
22
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 17, 2015.
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?