THR California L.P. v. Taylor et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting in full 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/19/13. This case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin, Lodi Judicial Branch. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THR CALIFORNIA, L.P.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-2320 KJM CKD PS

v.

ORDER

STEVE TAYLOR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action from state court. The

17
18

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On November 13, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which

19
20

were served on defendants and which contained notice to defendants that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have not filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

24

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

25

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully

26

reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record

27

and by the proper analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 13, 2013 are adopted in full; and

3

2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California,

4

County of San Joaquin, Lodi Judicial Branch.

5

DATED: December 19, 2013.

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2