Net v. Napolitano et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/9/2014 DISMISSING this action without prejudice due to petitioner's failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMBOEUN NET, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-2340 DAD P v. ORDER JANET NAPOLITANO, 15 Respondents. 16 A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned to the court 17 18 by the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local 19 Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any 20 address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the 21 postal service and petitioner has failed to notify the court of a current address. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without 22 23 prejudice due to petitioner’s failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).1 24 Dated: September 9, 2014 25 26 27 28 DAD:9 net2340.133a 1 Both parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Doc. Nos. 3 & 4) 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?