Cannonier v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/29/14. Plaintiff shall have until 6/19/14 to file motion for summary judgment. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
Cyrus Safa
Attorney at Law: 282971
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-Mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ALYCE M. CANNONIER
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALYCE M. CANNONIER
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1 Acting
Commissioner of Social Security.
15
Defendant.
16
) Case No.: 2:13-cv-02382-KJN
)
) │PROPOSED│ ORDER EXTENDING
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, to
20
21
and include June 19, 2014, in which to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment and/or Remand; and that all other deadlines set forth in the December
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on
February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted, therefore, for
Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need
be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the
Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For simplicity, Plaintiff will refer to the
Acting Commissioner as the Commissioner.
-1-
1
12, 2013 Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. IT IS SO
2
ORDERED.
3
Dated: May 29, 2014
4
5
6
7
Respectfully submitted,
8
LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing
9
10
11
12
/s/Cyrus Safa
BY: _________________________
Cyrus Safa
Attorney for plaintiff
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?