Cannonier v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/29/14. Plaintiff shall have until 6/19/14 to file motion for summary judgment. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Cyrus Safa Attorney at Law: 282971 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-Mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ALYCE M. CANNONIER 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALYCE M. CANNONIER 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security. 15 Defendant. 16 ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-02382-KJN ) ) │PROPOSED│ ORDER EXTENDING ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown, 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, to 20 21 and include June 19, 2014, in which to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Remand; and that all other deadlines set forth in the December 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted, therefore, for Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For simplicity, Plaintiff will refer to the Acting Commissioner as the Commissioner. -1- 1 12, 2013 Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. IT IS SO 2 ORDERED. 3 Dated: May 29, 2014 4 5 6 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing 9 10 11 12 /s/Cyrus Safa BY: _________________________ Cyrus Safa Attorney for plaintiff 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?