Garcia v. Sahir et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/20/2015 GRANTING plaintiff's 25 motion for an extension of time; plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint; and plaintiff's 22 motion for reconsideration regarding IFP status is DENIED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JOSE LUIS GARCIA,

11
12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-2385 AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

NASEER SAHIR, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17
18

Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file a second amended complaint.
Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request is granted.
Plaintiff’s December 29, 2014 “Motion for Reconsideration for Abuse of Discretion in

19

Support of Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis,” ECF No. 22, is denied as moot because

20

plaintiff has already been granted in forma pauperis status in this case. See ECF No. 15.

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1. Plaintiff’s March 13, 2015 motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 25) is granted;

23

2. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file a second

24
25
26
27
28

amended complaint; and
3. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration regarding IFP status (ECF No. 22) is denied.
DATED: March 20, 2015