McColgan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/4/14 re: 17 EXTENDING deadline to complete early meeting of counsel and submit a joint CMC Statement from 2/27/14 to 3/27/14. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
J. Russell Stedman (117130)
rstedman@bargerwolen.com
Peter J. Felsenfeld (260433)
pfelsenfeld@bargerwolen.com
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
650 California Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: (415) 434-2800
Facsimile: (415) 434-2533
Attorneys for Defendant
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
INSURANCE COMPANY
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
SANDRA C. MCCOLGAN,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
vs.
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 2:13-CV-02417-JAM-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR EARLY
MEETING OF COUNSEL AND FILING
OF JOINT CMC STATEMENT
Complaint Filed: September 6, 2013
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
650 CALIFORNIA STREET
NINTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
(415) 434-2800
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EMC AND CMC STATEMENT DEADLINE
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02417-JAM-DAD
1
Plaintiff Sandra D. McColgan (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Mutual of Omaha
2
Insurance Company (“Mutual of Omaha”) (collectively “the Parties”), through their
3
counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
4
RECITALS
5
1. Mutual of Omaha removed this action from state court to this Court on
6
November 20, 2013. Pursuant to Judge Mendez’s Initial Scheduling Order, the Parties
7
were required to complete their early meeting of counsel and submit a joint CMC
8
Statement within 60 days of removal, which was January 17, 2014.
9
2.
On November 26, 2013, Mutual of Omaha filed a Motion to Dismiss
10
pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). The hearing on that motion was originally scheduled for
11
January 22, 2014.
12
3.
On January 9, 2014, the Parties stipulated to extend the deadline to
13
complete the EMC and submit a joint CMC Statement from January 17, 2014 to February
14
27, 2014, after the scheduled hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss.
15
4.
On January 16, 2014, the Court issued a Minute Order stating that the
16
Motion to Dismiss would be submitted without appearance and without argument
17
pursuant to Local Rule 230(h). The Court has not yet ruled on the motion.
18
5.
Mutual of Omaha prefers to wait for a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss
19
before having the early meeting with counsel and submitting a CMC Statement since, if
20
granted, this will not be necessary, and if denied, the Court’s Order may assist the Parties
21
in their discussion of scheduling. Plaintiff is agreeable to the continuance.
22
6.
The extension will not affect any other scheduled deadlines. The Parties
23
do not currently anticipate the need for further continuances.
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
650 CALIFORNIA STREET
NINTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
(415) 434-2800
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EMC AND CMC STATEMENT DEADLINE
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02417-JAM-DAD
1
STIPULATION
2
The Parties hereby stipulate that the deadline to complete their early meeting of
3
counsel and submit a joint CMC Statement is extended from February 27, 2014 to March
4
27, 2014.
5
6
SO STIPULATED:
Dated: February 03, 2014
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
7
By: /s/ J. Russell Stedman
J. RUSSELL STEDMAN
PETER J. FELSENFELD
Attorney for Defendant
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE
COMPANY
8
9
10
11
Dated: February 03, 2014
BARR & MUDFORD, LLP
12
13
14
15
16
By: /s/ John Douglass Barr
JOHN DOUGLASS BARR
TROY DOUGLAS MUDFORD
DAVID LEE CASE
ESTEE LEWIS
Attorneys for Plaintiff, SANDRA
MCCOLGAN
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
650 CALIFORNIA STREET
NINTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
(415) 434-2800
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EMC AND CMC STATEMENT DEADLINE
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02417-JAM-DAD
1
2
ORDER
The Parties, by and through their counsel of record, have stipulated that the
3
deadline to complete their early meeting of counsel and submit a joint CMC Statement be
4
extended from February 27, 2014 to March 27, 2014.
5
Satisfactory proof having been shown and good cause appearing,
6
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: 2/4/2014
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
The Honorable John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
650 CALIFORNIA STREET
NINTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
(415) 434-2800
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EMC AND CMC STATEMENT DEADLINE
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02417-JAM-DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?