Bradley v. County of Sacramento Department of Human Assistance of Northern California Welfare Division et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/25/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 25 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 15 Amended Motion to Dismiss. The amended complaint's race-based discrimination and hostile work environment causes of action are DISMISSED; and Defendant is DIRECTED to file an answer to the amended complaint's age-based discrimination claim within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RUBY BRADLEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:13-cv-2420 TLN DAD PS

v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
ASSISTANCE OF NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA WELFARE DIVISION, et
al.,

17

ORDER

Defendants.

18
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a

19
20

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On July 22, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21
22

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

23

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings

24

and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed objection to the findings and recommendations.

25

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

26

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2
3

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 22, 2015 (Dkt. No. 25) are
adopted in full;
2. Defendant’s November 21, 2014 amended motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is

4
5
6
7
8
9

granted;
3. The amended complaint’s race-based discrimination and hostile work
environment causes of action are dismissed; and
4. Defendant is directed to file an answer to the amended complaint’s age-based
discrimination claim within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and

10

recommendations.

11

Dated: August 25, 2015

12
13

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2