Bradley v. County of Sacramento Department of Human Assistance of Northern California Welfare Division et al

Filing 39

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/10/15: Plaintiff shall disclose experts no later than 5/6/16. Defendants shall disclose experts no later than 5/20/16. Discovery due by 7/1/2016. Dispositive Motions filed by 8/19/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/20/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Jury Trial set for 1/17/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RUBY BRADLEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:13-cv-2420 TLN CKD PS (TEMP)

v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
ASSISTANCE OF NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA WELFARE DIVISION, et
al.,

17

ORDER

Defendants.

18
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

19

READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES WHICH

20
21

THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL PARTIES MUST

22

COMPLY. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT

23

IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER SANCTIONS WITHIN THE

24

POWER OF THE COURT, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT.

25

Pursuant to court order, a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference was held on November

26

6, 2015. Plaintiff Ruby Bradley appeared telephonically in propria persona. Attorney Chambord

27

Benton-Hayes appeared in person for defendants.

28

/////
1

1
2
3

After hearing, the court makes the following findings and orders:
SERVICE OF PROCESS
Defendants have been served and no further service is permitted except with leave of

4

court, good cause having been shown.

5

JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS

6

No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted except with leave of

7

court, good cause having been shown.

8

JURISDICTION/VENUE

9

Jurisdiction over this action is predicated on the court’s federal question jurisdiction

10

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Defendants do not dispute either jurisdiction or venue and both

11

appear to be proper.

12

DISCOVERY

13

The parties shall make initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 no

14

later than 28 days from the date of the November 6, 2015 hearing. Plaintiff shall disclose experts

15

no later than May 6, 2016. Defendants shall disclose experts no later than May 20, 2016.

16

Rebuttal experts shall be disclosed no later than May 27, 2016. All discovery is left open, save

17

and except that it shall be so conducted as to be completed by July 1, 2016. The word

18

“completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been

19

taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if

20

necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with.

21

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

22

All law and motion except as to discovery is left open, save and except that it shall be

23

conducted so as to be completed by August 19, 2016. The word “completed” in this context

24

means that all law and motion matters must be heard by the above date. The parties are cautioned

25

to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing such motions on the court’s

26

regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. This paragraph does not preclude motions for

27

continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, and is subject to any

28

special scheduling set forth in the “MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS” paragraph below.
2

1

The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and

2

refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are

3

susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify

4

and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in light of the

5

evidence gleaned through discovery. If it appears after examining the legal issues and facts that

6

an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, the parties are to file the appropriate motion by the

7

law and motion cutoff set forth supra.

8

ALL PURELY LEGAL ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY TIMELY PRETRIAL

9

MOTION. The parties are reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to

10

address the admissibility of evidence. THE PARTIES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE COURT

11

WILL LOOK WITH DISFAVOR UPON SUBSTANTIVE MOTIONS PRESENTED IN THE

12

GUISE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL.

13

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

14

The Final Pretrial Conference is set for October 20, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom no. 2

15

before the Honorable Troy L. Nunley. Trial counsel shall appear at the Final Pretrial Conference.

16

The parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no

17

matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. The

18

parties are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the contents of and time for filing

19

Pretrial Statements. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES 281 AND 282 WILL

20

BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS.

21

Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 281, which contemplates the filing of

22

separate Pretrial Statements by plaintiffs and defendants, the parties are to prepare a JOINT

23

STATEMENT with respect to the undisputed facts and disputed factual issues of the case. The

24

undisputed facts and disputed factual issues are to be set forth in two separate sections. The

25

parties should identify those facts which are relevant to each separate cause of action. In this

26

regard, the parties are to number each individual fact or factual issue. Where the parties are

27

unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before the court for trial, they should

28

nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES” all issues asserted by any of
3

1

the parties and explain by parenthetical the controversy concerning each issue. The parties should

2

keep in mind that, in general, each fact should relate or correspond to an element of the relevant

3

cause of action. The parties should also keep in mind that the purpose of listing the disputed

4

factual issues is to apprise the court and all parties about the precise issues that will be litigated at

5

trial. The court is not interested in a listing of all evidentiary facts underlying the issues that are

6

in dispute. However, with respect to the listing of undisputed facts, the court will accept

7

agreements as to evidentiary facts. The joint statement of undisputed facts and disputed factual

8

issues is to be filed with the court concurrently with the filing of plaintiff’s Pretrial Statement. If

9

the case is tried to a jury, the undisputed facts will be read to the jury.

10

Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(10) and (11), the parties are required to provide in their

11

Pretrial Statements a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter

12

for what purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the Pretrial Statement itself, but shall be

13

attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final Pretrial Order. Plaintiff’s

14

exhibits shall be listed numerically; defendants’ exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. The

15

Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and exhibits at trial

16

not listed in the Pretrial Order. Counsel are cautioned that the standard will be strictly applied.

17

On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses which counsel do not intend to call or use

18

will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.

19

The parties are also reminded that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, it will be their duty at

20

the Pretrial Conference to aid the court in (a) formulation and simplification of issues and the

21

elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts which should be properly

22

admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must

23

prepare their Pretrial Statements, and participate in good faith at the Pretrial Conference, with

24

these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF

25

SANCTIONS which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, eliminations of

26

claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the court deems appropriate.

27

/////

28

/////
4

1
2

TRIAL SETTING
Trial is set on January 17, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 2 before the Honorable Troy

3

L. Nunley. Trial will be by jury and is estimated to last 5 days.

4

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

5

If the parties determine a settlement conference would be beneficial, the courtroom deputy

6

may be contacted to arrange a date for the settlement conference. In absence of a waiver of

7

disqualification of the undersigned, the settlement conference will be set before another

8

magistrate judge.

9

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

10
11
12
13

There appear to be no other matters presently pending before the court that will aid the
just and expeditious disposition of this matter.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), THE COURT SUMMARIZES THE SCHEDULING
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

14

1. Initial disclosures shall be made no later than 28 days from November 6, 2015.

15

2. Plaintiff shall disclose experts no later than May 6, 2016.

16

3. Defendants shall disclose experts no later May 20, 2016.

17

4. Rebuttal experts shall be disclosed no later than May 27, 2016.

18

5. Discovery shall be completed by July 1, 2016.

19

6. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by

20
21
22
23
24

August 19, 2016.
7. Final pretrial conference is set for October 20, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 2
before the Honorable Troy L. Nunley.
8. This matter is set for jury trial on January 17, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 2
before the Honorable Troy L. Nunley.

25
26

Dated: November 10, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28

BVD\bradley2420.sched.ord.docx

5