United States of America v. Porath et al
Filing
22
AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Marzella J. Porath, Ronald B. Porath issued on 04/23/15. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
RONALD B. PORATH and
)
MARZELLA J. PORATH,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-02436-TLN-KJN
AMENDED
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
This Amended Default Judgment supersedes and replaces the Court’s prior Default
Judgment (Dkt. 20). IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED default judgment is hereby
ENTERED against defendants:
Ronald B. Porath and in favor of the United States in the amount of $16,572.06, plus
interest and other statutory additions from January 9, 2015, which represents the unpaid
balance of the federal income tax liabilities assessed against Ronald B. Porath for the tax
years 2006, 2007, and 2008, together with accrued but unassessed interest and other
statutory additions, together with statutory interest and other additions accruing thereafter
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621 & 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c) until paid; and
21
///
22
///
23
Marzella J. Porath and in favor of the United States in the amount of $17,951.25, plus
1
2
3
4
5
interest and other statutory additions from January 9, 2015, which represents the unpaid
balance of the federal income tax liabilities assessed against Marzella J. Porath for the tax
years 2006, 2007, and 2008, together with accrued but unassessed interest and other
statutory additions, together with statutory interest and other additions accruing thereafter
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621 & 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c) until paid.
Date: April 23, 2015
, 2015.
MARIANNE MATHERLY, CLERK
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
By: /s/ A. Benson
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?