United States of America v. Porath et al

Filing 22

AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Marzella J. Porath, Ronald B. Porath issued on 04/23/15. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RONALD B. PORATH and ) MARZELLA J. PORATH, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) Case No. 2:13-cv-02436-TLN-KJN AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT This Amended Default Judgment supersedes and replaces the Court’s prior Default Judgment (Dkt. 20). IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED default judgment is hereby ENTERED against defendants: Ronald B. Porath and in favor of the United States in the amount of $16,572.06, plus interest and other statutory additions from January 9, 2015, which represents the unpaid balance of the federal income tax liabilities assessed against Ronald B. Porath for the tax years 2006, 2007, and 2008, together with accrued but unassessed interest and other statutory additions, together with statutory interest and other additions accruing thereafter pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621 & 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c) until paid; and 21 /// 22 /// 23 Marzella J. Porath and in favor of the United States in the amount of $17,951.25, plus 1 2 3 4 5 interest and other statutory additions from January 9, 2015, which represents the unpaid balance of the federal income tax liabilities assessed against Marzella J. Porath for the tax years 2006, 2007, and 2008, together with accrued but unassessed interest and other statutory additions, together with statutory interest and other additions accruing thereafter pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621 & 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c) until paid. Date: April 23, 2015 , 2015. MARIANNE MATHERLY, CLERK 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ A. Benson Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?