Sciosciole v. Gower
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/01/18 DENYING 74 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDWARD FRANCIS SCIOSCIOLE,
12
No. 2:13-cv-2438 CKD P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
GOWER,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner has requested a certificate of appealability with respect to the court’s July 10,
18
2018 denial of his motion to re-open this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action.1 Because petitioner has not
19
shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the court abused its discretion in
20
denying petitioner’s motion, and jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the underlying
21
petition for a writ of habeas corpus states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right, see
22
U.S. v. Winkles, 795 F.3d 1134, 1143 (9th Cir. 2015), petitioner’s request (ECF No. 74) is
23
denied.
24
Dated: August 1, 2018
25
26
27
28
1/scio2438.coa
1
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Both parties have consented to having all matters in this action before a United State Magistrate
Judge. See 28. U.S.C. § 636(c).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?