Alford v. Ma
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/23/15 ORDERING that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed a s consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiffs failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint 28 is DENIED without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TRACY FIDEL ALFORD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
No. 2:13-cv-2493 KJM KJN P
DR. MA,
15
ORDER
Defendant.
16
17
On March 25, 2015, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal
18
Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff failed to file an opposition to the motion.
19
Accordingly, on May 12, 2015, the undersigned filed an order directing plaintiff to file an
20
opposition within 30 days or else face dismissal of the action for lack of prosecution, for failure to
21
comply with the court’s order, and for failure to comply with the Local Rules of the Eastern
22
District of California.
23
By prior order filed March 18, 2014 (ECF No. 15), plaintiff was advised of the
24
requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be
25
deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir.
26
1998) (en banc); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). Defendant also
27
served plaintiff with a notice, pursuant to Rand and Klingele, regarding the requirements for
28
opposing a motion for summary judgment. (See ECF No. 26 at 29-32.)
1
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
1
2
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
3
the granting of the motion . . . .”
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for
4
5
imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of
6
the Court.” In the order filed March 18, 2014, plaintiff was also advised that failure to comply
7
with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.
8
Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:
9
Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or
to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move
to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal
order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and
any dismissal not under this rule--except one for lack of
jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule
19--operates as an adjudication on the merits.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Id.
On June 1, 2015, plaintiff filed a one-page document entitled “Request to Amend the
Complaint.” It provides, in its entirety, as follows:
16
Plaintiff is a California state prisoner proceeding without counsel in
an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983.
17
On March 25, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary
judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff
has not opposed the motion.
18
19
It is plaintiff’s wish to opposed defendants motion for summary
judgment.
20
21
Therefore pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(2),
Plaintiff respectfully request to amend the complaint.
22
23
24
(ECF No. 28.)
Plaintiff is informed that in order to oppose defendant’s motion for summary judgment, he
25
must file an opposition that satisfies the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and
26
Local Rule 260. Plaintiff has not made a showing as to how amending the operative complaint
27
will satisfy these requirements. Accordingly, the court declines to grant plaintiff leave to file an
28
amended complaint.
2
1
Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to file an opposition to the pending motion for
2
summary judgment. Plaintiff is cautioned that it is extremely unlikely that any further extensions
3
of time will be granted.
4
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any,
6
to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to
7
have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on
8
plaintiff’s failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a
9
recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
10
2. Plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 28) is denied without
11
prejudice.
12
Dated: June 23, 2015
13
14
/alfo2493.nooppo.kjn.2nd
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?