DirecTV, LLC v. Dish One Satellite, LLC, et al.

Filing 42

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/22/14 CONTINUING HEARING as to 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 37 Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Strike, 38 Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Stay: Motion Hearing reset for 4/24/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 DIRECTV, LLC, a California limited liability corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 DISH ONE SATELLITE, LLC, a Utah limited 16 liability corporation; MICHAEL HAMMOND, an individual; JEREMY 17 HAMMOND, an individual; ALEXANDER AMINI, an individual; BLAKE JANSON, an 18 individual; CODY YARDLEY, an individual; and DOES 2 through 20, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 CASE NO. 2:13-cv-02497-TLN-KJN ORDER CONTINUING ALL PENDING MOTIONS FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS WHILE THE PARTIES DISCUSS SETTLEMENT 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:13-cv-02497-TLN-KJN ORDER CONTINUING ALL PENDING MOTIONS FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause being shown, all proceedings 2 in this matter are temporarily stayed and the hearing dates for (1) DIRECTV's Motion for 3 Preliminary Injunction; (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Strike; and (3) Defendants' Motion 4 to Dismiss or Stay Proceeding Pending Arbitration are continued for sixty (60) days. The new 5 hearing date for DIRECTV's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendants' Motions to 6 Dismiss will be on April 24, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. The remaining briefing for each of these Motions 7 will be set pursuant to this new hearing date. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: January 22, 2014 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case No. 2:13-cv-02497-TLN-KJN ORDER CONTINUING ALL PENDING MOTIONS FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?