Mayfield v. Orozco, et al.
Filing
171
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/19/16 ORDERING that the 12/21/16 hearing on 160 Motion for Reasonable Expenses and Sanctions and 161 Motion for Reasonable Expenses is VACATED; the parties shall file simultaneous Supplemental Briefs, addressing the appropriate rate to be applied in this case, within 21 days; the parties may each file a Reply Memorandum 7 days thereafter. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, JAMES
ALLISON MAYFIELD, JR., and TERRI
MAYFIELD,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
No. 2:13-cv-02499 JAM AC
ORDER
v.
IVAN OROZCO, SHERIFF
SCOTTJONES, JAMES LEWIS,
RICKPATTISON, COUNTY
OFSACRAMENTO, UNIVERSITY
OFCALIFORNIA
DAVISHEALTHSYSTEM, DR.
GREGORYSOKOLOV, DR. ROBERT
HALS, and Does 1-5,
Defendants.
21
22
Plaintiffs have filed two motions for attorneys fees, one against County defendants and
23
one against UC Davis defendants, both noticed for hearing on December 19, 2016. Having
24
reviewed the moving papers, oppositions and replies, the court notes that the parties have failed to
25
establish the relevant rate in the Eastern District of California or a basis for deviating from that
26
rate as required by Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc., 523 F.3d 973 (2008), instead
27
addressing only the rates charged by plaintiffs in similar cases without reference to this
28
community’s rates. See also Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Assoc. v. California Dept. of
1
1
Education, 2016 WL 4375015 at 13 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2016); Lehr v. City of Sacramento, 2013
2
WL 13286549 at *4 (E.D. Cal. April 2, 2013).
3
In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The December 21, 2016 hearing on plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Expenses and
5
Sanctions (ECF No. 160) and Motion for Reasonable Expenses (ECF No. 161) is
6
VACATED;
7
8
9
10
2. The parties shall file simultaneous Supplemental Briefs, addressing the appropriate rate to
be applied in this case, within 21 days of this Order;
3. The parties may each file a Reply Memorandum 7 days thereafter.
DATED: December 19, 2016
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?