Mayfield v. Orozco, et al.
Filing
176
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/6/2017 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing on 172 Motion to Bifurcate Trial to 2/21/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that the plaintiff's opposition and the defendants' reply are submitted in accordance with Federal and Local Rules. (Michel, G.)
1 Barbara Enloe Hadsell, Esq. [S.B. #086021]
Dan Stormer, Esq. [S.B. # 101967]
2 Acrivi Coromelas, Esq. [S.B. #298305]
Caitlan McLoon, Esq. [S.B. #302798]
3 HADSELL STORMER & RENICK LLP
128 N. Fair Oaks Avenue
4 Pasadena, California 91103
Tel: (626) 585-9600/Fax: (626) 577-7079
5 Emails: bhadsell@hadsellstormer.com
dstormer@hadsellstormer.com
6
acoromelas@hadsellstormer.com
7
cmcloon@hadsellstormer.com
8 Joshua Piovia-Scott, Esq. [S.B. #222364]
Lori Rifkin, Esq. [S.B. # 244081]
9 HADSELL STORMER & RENICK LLP
10 4300 Horton Street, #15
Emeryville, CA 94608
11 Tel: (415) 685-3591/Fax: (626) 577-7079
Email: jps@hadsellstormer.com
12
lrifkin@hadsellstormer.com
13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
[Counsel for Defendants listed on next page]
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17 JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, et al.,
Case No.: 2:13-CV-02499-JAM-AC
18
[Assigned to the Honorable John A.
Mendez – Courtroom 6]
Plaintiffs,
19 vs.
20 IVAN OROZCO, et al.,
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
AMENDED STIPULATION
BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS ESTATE
OF JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD,
JAMES ALLISON MAYFIELD, AND
TERRI MAYFIELD AND
DEFENDANTS UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA DAVIS HEALTH
SYSTEM, DR. GREGORY
SOKOLOV, AND DR. ROBERT
HALES TO CONTINUE HEARING
DATE RE: MOTION TO
BIFURCATE TRIAL; ORDER
Complaint filed:
Discovery Cut-Off:
Motion Cut-Off:
Trial Date:
27
28
AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING
RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
December 3, 2013
October 14, 2016
February 8, 2017
May 1, 2017
1
[continued from first page]
2
Scott L. Gassaway, Esq. [S.B. #53581]
Robert F. Tyler, Esq. [S.B. #63055]
Neal C. Lutterman, Esq. [S.B. #174681]
Bianca S. Watts, Esq. [S.B. #278231]
WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP
400 Capitol Mall, 22nd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814-4407
Telephone: (916) 441-2430
Facsimile: (916) 442-6664
Email: sgassaway@wilkefleury.com
rtyler@wilkefleury.com
nlutterman@wilkefleury.com
bwatts@wilkefleury.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
now sued as the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
HEALTH SYSTEM, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, sued in
his individual capacity, and DR. ROBERT HALES, sued in
his individual capacity
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING
RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS ESTATE OF
2
JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, BY AND THROUGH LISA BERG, AS
3
CONSERVATOR, JAMES ALLISON MAYFIELD, JR., AND TERRI
4
MAYFIELD, AND DEFENDANTS THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
5
DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, AND DR.
6
ROBERT HALES AS FOLLOWS:
7
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2016, Defendants Regents of the University of
8
California, now sued as the University of California Davis Health System, Dr.
9
Gregory Sokolov, and Dr. Robert Hales (“JPS Defendants”) noticed a Motion to
10
Bifurcate Trial for hearing on January 24, 2017 (ECF No. 172);
11
WHEREAS, the present hearing date requires Plaintiffs Estate of James
12
Joshua Mayfield, by and through Lisa Berg, as Conservator, James Allison
13
Mayfield, Jr., and Terri Mayfield (“Plaintiffs”) to oppose the Motion to Bifurcate at
14
the same time as they are opposing three sizeable summary judgment motions in
15
this same matter; and
16
WHEREAS, a brief continuance of the hearing on JPS Defendants’ Motion
17
to Bifurcate will not prejudice any party to this action nor delay the May 1, 2017
18
trial;
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING
RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
-1-
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND
2
JPS DEFENDANTS, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF
3
RECORD, that the hearing on the Motion to Bifurcate is continued from January
4
24, 2017 to February 21, 2017, with briefing due in accordance with the Local and
5
Federal Rules.
Respectfully submitted,
6
7
Dated: January 6, 2017
HADSELL STORMER& RENICK LLP
8
By
9
10
11
12
13
/s/ - Caitlan McLoon
Barbara Enloe Hadsell
Dan Stormer
Josh Piovia-Scott
Lori Rifkin
Acrivi Coromelas
Caitlan McLoon
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD,
JAMES ALLISON MAYFIELD JR.,
TERRI MAYFIELD
14
15
Dated: January 6, 2017
WILKE FLEURY HOFFELT
GOULD & BIRNEY
16
17
By
18
19
20
21
22
/s/ - Neal Lutterman
Robert F. Tyler, Jr.
Neal C. Lutterman
Bianca Watts
Attorney for Defendants
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM, DR.
GREGORY SOKOLOV, DR.
ROBERT HALES
23
Attestation Regarding Signatures
24
I, Caitlan McLoon, hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on
25
whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have
26
authorized the filing.
27
Dated: January 6, 2017
By
28
AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING
RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
-2-
/s/ - Caitlan McLoon
Caitlan McLoon
1
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE
2
TRIAL
3
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants the
4
University of California Davis Health System, Dr. Gregory Sokolov, and Dr.
5
Robert Hales, and good cause appearing, the hearing on the Motion to Bifurcate
6
Trial is hereby CONTINUED from January 24, 2017, to February 21, 2017 at 1:30
7
p.m. Plaintiffs’ opposition and Defendants’ reply are due in accordance with the
8
Federal and Local Rules.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
Dated: 1/6/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING
RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?