Mayfield v. Orozco, et al.

Filing 176

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/6/2017 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing on 172 Motion to Bifurcate Trial to 2/21/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that the plaintiff's opposition and the defendants' reply are submitted in accordance with Federal and Local Rules. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 Barbara Enloe Hadsell, Esq. [S.B. #086021] Dan Stormer, Esq. [S.B. # 101967] 2 Acrivi Coromelas, Esq. [S.B. #298305] Caitlan McLoon, Esq. [S.B. #302798] 3 HADSELL STORMER & RENICK LLP 128 N. Fair Oaks Avenue 4 Pasadena, California 91103 Tel: (626) 585-9600/Fax: (626) 577-7079 5 Emails: bhadsell@hadsellstormer.com dstormer@hadsellstormer.com 6 acoromelas@hadsellstormer.com 7 cmcloon@hadsellstormer.com 8 Joshua Piovia-Scott, Esq. [S.B. #222364] Lori Rifkin, Esq. [S.B. # 244081] 9 HADSELL STORMER & RENICK LLP 10 4300 Horton Street, #15 Emeryville, CA 94608 11 Tel: (415) 685-3591/Fax: (626) 577-7079 Email: jps@hadsellstormer.com 12 lrifkin@hadsellstormer.com 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 [Counsel for Defendants listed on next page] 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, et al., Case No.: 2:13-CV-02499-JAM-AC 18 [Assigned to the Honorable John A. Mendez – Courtroom 6] Plaintiffs, 19 vs. 20 IVAN OROZCO, et al., 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 AMENDED STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS ESTATE OF JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, JAMES ALLISON MAYFIELD, AND TERRI MAYFIELD AND DEFENDANTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, AND DR. ROBERT HALES TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE TRIAL; ORDER Complaint filed: Discovery Cut-Off: Motion Cut-Off: Trial Date: 27 28 AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER December 3, 2013 October 14, 2016 February 8, 2017 May 1, 2017 1 [continued from first page] 2 Scott L. Gassaway, Esq. [S.B. #53581] Robert F. Tyler, Esq. [S.B. #63055] Neal C. Lutterman, Esq. [S.B. #174681] Bianca S. Watts, Esq. [S.B. #278231] WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 400 Capitol Mall, 22nd Floor Sacramento, California 95814-4407 Telephone: (916) 441-2430 Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 Email: sgassaway@wilkefleury.com rtyler@wilkefleury.com nlutterman@wilkefleury.com bwatts@wilkefleury.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, now sued as the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, sued in his individual capacity, and DR. ROBERT HALES, sued in his individual capacity 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS ESTATE OF 2 JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, BY AND THROUGH LISA BERG, AS 3 CONSERVATOR, JAMES ALLISON MAYFIELD, JR., AND TERRI 4 MAYFIELD, AND DEFENDANTS THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 5 DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, AND DR. 6 ROBERT HALES AS FOLLOWS: 7 WHEREAS, on December 23, 2016, Defendants Regents of the University of 8 California, now sued as the University of California Davis Health System, Dr. 9 Gregory Sokolov, and Dr. Robert Hales (“JPS Defendants”) noticed a Motion to 10 Bifurcate Trial for hearing on January 24, 2017 (ECF No. 172); 11 WHEREAS, the present hearing date requires Plaintiffs Estate of James 12 Joshua Mayfield, by and through Lisa Berg, as Conservator, James Allison 13 Mayfield, Jr., and Terri Mayfield (“Plaintiffs”) to oppose the Motion to Bifurcate at 14 the same time as they are opposing three sizeable summary judgment motions in 15 this same matter; and 16 WHEREAS, a brief continuance of the hearing on JPS Defendants’ Motion 17 to Bifurcate will not prejudice any party to this action nor delay the May 1, 2017 18 trial; 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER -1- 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND 2 JPS DEFENDANTS, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF 3 RECORD, that the hearing on the Motion to Bifurcate is continued from January 4 24, 2017 to February 21, 2017, with briefing due in accordance with the Local and 5 Federal Rules. Respectfully submitted, 6 7 Dated: January 6, 2017 HADSELL STORMER& RENICK LLP 8 By 9 10 11 12 13 /s/ - Caitlan McLoon Barbara Enloe Hadsell Dan Stormer Josh Piovia-Scott Lori Rifkin Acrivi Coromelas Caitlan McLoon Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, JAMES ALLISON MAYFIELD JR., TERRI MAYFIELD 14 15 Dated: January 6, 2017 WILKE FLEURY HOFFELT GOULD & BIRNEY 16 17 By 18 19 20 21 22 /s/ - Neal Lutterman Robert F. Tyler, Jr. Neal C. Lutterman Bianca Watts Attorney for Defendants UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM, DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, DR. ROBERT HALES 23 Attestation Regarding Signatures 24 I, Caitlan McLoon, hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on 25 whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have 26 authorized the filing. 27 Dated: January 6, 2017 By 28 AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER -2- /s/ - Caitlan McLoon Caitlan McLoon 1 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE 2 TRIAL 3 Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants the 4 University of California Davis Health System, Dr. Gregory Sokolov, and Dr. 5 Robert Hales, and good cause appearing, the hearing on the Motion to Bifurcate 6 Trial is hereby CONTINUED from January 24, 2017, to February 21, 2017 at 1:30 7 p.m. Plaintiffs’ opposition and Defendants’ reply are due in accordance with the 8 Federal and Local Rules. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: 1/6/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMND STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?