Mayfield v. Orozco, et al.

Filing 206

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/2/2017 GRANTING 199 Notice of Request to Seal Documents filed in support of defendant's reply to plaintiffs' opposition to motion for summary judgment. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301
Adam J. DeBow, SBN 305809
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant IVAN OROZCO

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

Case No.: 2:13-cv-02499-JAM-AC

Estate of JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, by and
through LISA BERG, as Conservator; JAMES
ALLISON MAYFIELD, JR.; and TERRI
MAYFIELD,

13

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT IVAN
OROZCO’S
REQUEST
TO
SEAL
DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION
TO
MOTION
FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE,
SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION

Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

vs.
IVAN OROZCO, in his individual capacity;
SHERIFF SCOTT JONES, in his individual and
official capacity; RICK PATTISON, in his
individual and official capacity; COUNTY OF
SACRAMENTO;
UNIVERSITY
OF
CALIFORNIA DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM;
DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, in his individual
capacity; DR. ROBERT HALES, in his
individual capacity; and DOES 1-5,

Date: March 7, 2017
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 6
Judge: John A. Mendez

Defendants.

22
23

/

24
25

Defendant IVAN OROZCO’s Request to Seal Documents Filed in Support of Defendant’s

26

Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative,

27

Summary Adjudication, is GRANTED:

28

///
{01643270.DOCX}

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT IVAN OROZCO’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The following documents be filed under seal: Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’

3

Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, Objection to Plaintiffs’ Evidence in Support

4

of Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s response

5

to separate statement of undisputed facts, Defendant’s responses to Plaintiff’s statement of additional

6

facts, and Defendant’s supplemental index of exhibits.

7
8

2.

Other than the Court and its staff, the foregoing documents will be visible and accessible

to the following individuals only:

9

a.

Barbara Enloe Hadsell, Dan Stormer, Joshua Piovia-Scott, Acrivi Coromelas,

10

and Caitlan McLoon of HADSELL STORMER & RENICK LLP and associate attorneys in their

11

office, and Lori Rifkin of the RIFKIN LAW OFFICE, and associate attorneys in her office, as counsel

12

for Plaintiffs JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, JAMES ALLISON MAYFIELD JR., and TERRI

13

MAYFIELD, in the case enumerated above;

14

b.

Van Longyear, Peter Zilaff, and Nicole Cahill of LONGYEAR, O’DEA &

15

LAVRA, LLP and associate attorneys in their office, as counsel for Defendants COUNTY OF

16

SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, JAMES LEWIS, and RICK PATTISON, in the case enumerated

17

above;

18

c.

Robert F. Tyler, Jr., Neal C. Lutterman, Scott Gassaway and Bianca S. Watts of

19

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP and associate attorneys of their office, as

20

counsel

21

DR. GREGORY SOKOLOV, and DR. ROBERT HALES, in the case enumerated above; and

for

22
23

Defendants

d.

UNIVERSITY

OF

CALIFORNIA

DAVIS

HEALTH

SYSTEM,

John Whitefleet and Adam DeBow PORTER SCOTT, and associate attorneys in

their office, as counsel for Defendant IVAN OROZCO, in the case enumerated above; and

24

e.

Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel

25

referred to in subparts (a)-(d) immediately above, including stenographic deposition reports or

26

videographers retained in connection with this action.

27

///

28

3.
{01643270.DOCX}

The foregoing documents and records contained will remain under seal until the
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT IVAN OROZCO’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

1
2

conclusion of this litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: 2/2/2017

5
/s/ John A. Mendez___
Hon. John A. Mendez

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{01643270.DOCX}

3

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT IVAN OROZCO’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION