Hardy v. Sisson et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/11/16 DENYING 31 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KRISTIN HARDY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER SISSON, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 No. 2:13-CV-2514-GEB-CMK-P / Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has 20 ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in 21 § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain 22 exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 23 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. 24 Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). A finding of “exceptional 25 circumstances” requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the 26 ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims on his own in light of the complexity of the legal 1 1 issues involved. See Terrell, 935 F.2d at 1017. Neither factor is dispositive and both must be 2 viewed together before reaching a decision. See id. 3 In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional 4 circumstances. First, plaintiff has been able to adequately articulate the claims in this case, 5 which are not overly complex legally, without assistance. Second, the court cannot say at this 6 stage of proceedings prior to an answer to the complaint being filed whether plaintiff has a 7 likelihood of success on the merits. 8 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 31) is denied. 10 11 12 13 DATED: March 11, 2016 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?