McConnell v. Warden, CSP Solano
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/22/2014 ADOPTING 26 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 21 Motion to Stay and PARTIALLY GRANTING 15 Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner's unexhausted claim five is DISMISSED without prejudice. Respondent shall file a responsive pleading within 30 days. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM ROBERT MCCONNELL,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-2517 JAM KJN P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
GARY SWARTHOUT,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On August 12, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 12, 2014, are adopted in full;
28
2. Petitioner’s motion for stay (ECF No. 21) is denied;
1
1
3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is partially granted;
2
4. Petitioner’s unexhausted claim five is dismissed without prejudice; and
3
5. Respondent shall file a responsive pleading within thirty days.
4
DATED: October 22, 2014
5
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?