Timec Company, Inc. et al v. Brown et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER 9 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/31/2014 GRANTING intervention to State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
FREDRIC D. WOOCHER (SBN 96689)
RACHEL A. DEUTSCH (SBN 275826)
STRUMWASSER & WOOCHER LLP
10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90024
Telephone: (310) 576-1233
Facsimile: (310) 319-0156
E-mail: fwoocher@strumwooch.com
rdeutsch@strumwooch.com
Attorneys for Proposed Intervenor
State Building and Construction Trades
Council of California, AFL-CIO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
TIMEC COMPANY, INC., dba TRANSFIELD
SERVICES; PETROCHEM INSULATION, INC.;
SSP INDUSTRIAL RECLAMATION, a California
joint venture, dba PLANT RECLAMATION;
ANTHONY GILLISPIE; and RODOLFO LOPEZ,
Plaintiffs,
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, in his official capacity as
Governor of the State of California; KAMALA
HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney
General for the State of California; CHRISTINE
BAKER, in her official capacity as Director of the
California Department of Industrial Relations;
DIANE RAVNIK, in her official capacity as the
Chief of the California Division of Apprenticeship
Standards; MATT RODRIGUEZ, in his official
capacity as California Secretary for Environmental
Protection; CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Defendants.
STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION
TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AFL-CIO,
27
Intervenor.
28
Printed on Recycled Paper
TIMEC COMPANY, INC., ET AL V. EDMUND G. BROWN, ET AL
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTERVENTION
CASE NO.: 2:13-CV-02521-JAM-DAD
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02521 JAM DAD
ORDER GRANTING
INTERVENTION TO STATE
BUILDING AND
CONSTRUCTION TRADES
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA,
AFL-CIO
1
Pursuant to the Stipulation Regarding Intervention of State Building and Construction
2
Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO, filed in this action by Plaintiffs Timec Company,
3
Inc., dba Transfield Services; Petrochem Insulation, Inc.; SSP Industrial Reclamation, a
4
California Joint Venture, dba Plant Reclamation; Anthony Gillispie; and Rodolfo Lopez
5
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”); Defendants Edmund G. Brown, in his official capacity as Governor
6
of the State of California; Kamala Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the
7
State of California; Christine Baker, in her official capacity as Director of the California
8
Department of Industrial Relations; Diane Ravnik, in her official capacity as Chief of the
9
California Division of Apprenticeship Standards; Matt Rodriguez, in his official capacity as
10
California Secretary for Environmental Protection; and the California Environmental
11
Protection Agency (collectively, “Defendants”); and the State Building and Construction
12
Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO (“SBCTC” or “Intervenor”), IT IS HEREBY
13
ORDERED that:
14
1.
15
16
SBCTC shall be entitled to intervene as a defendant in this action pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24.
2.
SBCTC shall adhere to the briefing schedule previously agreed to by Plaintiffs
17
and Defendants for Plaintiffs’ intended Motion for Summary Judgment, which provides that
18
(a) Plaintiffs’ moving papers shall be filed and served no later than January 22, 2014; (b)
19
Defendants’ and Intervenor’s opposition papers shall be filed and served no later than
20
February 12, 2014; (c) Plaintiffs’ reply papers shall be filed and served no later than February
21
26, 2014; and (d) Plaintiffs’ motion shall be scheduled to be heard on March 5, 2014.
22
3.
Until such time as the Court rules on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment,
23
no party will serve or seek to take discovery from any other party or non-party to this action.
24
However, nothing in this Order shall preclude either Defendants or Intervenor from opposing
25
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the grounds that a genuine dispute exists as to
26
any material fact, that an asserted fact is not supported by admissible evidence, or that, due to
27
the absence of the opportunity to take discovery, facts essential to justify the opposition cannot
28
be presented.
1
TIMEC COMPANY, INC., ET AL V. EDMUND G. BROWN, ET AL
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTERVENTION
CASE NO.: 2:13-CV-02521-JAM-DAD
1
2
4.
Neither Plaintiffs nor Intervenor shall seek to recover their respective attorney’s
fees incurred in connection with this action from each other.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
/s/ John A. Mendez
DATED: 1/31/2014
7
John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
TIMEC COMPANY, INC., ET AL V. EDMUND G. BROWN, ET AL
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTERVENTION
CASE NO.: 2:13-CV-02521-JAM-DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?