Brown v. Rai et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/15 ORDERING the motion 9 is denied without prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIE BROWN, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-2535-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER RANJIT K. RAI, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendants. 16 17 18 On June 5, 2014, plaintiff filed an application for entry of default judgment against 19 defendant Ranjit Rai, and noticed the motion for hearing before the assigned district judge. ECF 20 No. 9. The district judge vacated the hearing and directed plaintiff to notice her motion for 21 hearing before the undersigned as required by Local Rule 302(c)(19). ECF No. 10. To date, 22 plaintiff has not re-noticed the motion, or otherwise responded to the minute order. Given that 23 more than seven months have passed since the hearing was vacated, it appears that plaintiff is no 24 longer interested in litigating her motion. Accordingly, the motion (ECF No. 9) is denied without 25 prejudice. 26 DATED: March 19, 2015. 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?