Brown v. Rai et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/15 ORDERING the motion 9 is denied without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JULIE BROWN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-2535-TLN-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
RANJIT K. RAI, STARBUCKS
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
16
17
18
On June 5, 2014, plaintiff filed an application for entry of default judgment against
19
defendant Ranjit Rai, and noticed the motion for hearing before the assigned district judge. ECF
20
No. 9. The district judge vacated the hearing and directed plaintiff to notice her motion for
21
hearing before the undersigned as required by Local Rule 302(c)(19). ECF No. 10. To date,
22
plaintiff has not re-noticed the motion, or otherwise responded to the minute order. Given that
23
more than seven months have passed since the hearing was vacated, it appears that plaintiff is no
24
longer interested in litigating her motion. Accordingly, the motion (ECF No. 9) is denied without
25
prejudice.
26
DATED: March 19, 2015.
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?