Alexander v. Solano County Detention Facility, et al.
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING 48 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/16/2015. Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as untimely. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES S. ALEXANDER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-2566 GEB CKD P
v.
ORDER
SOLANO COUNTY DETENTION
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On May 12, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
22
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
23
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 12, 2015, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 39) is denied as untimely.
4
Dated: June 16, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?