Linnihan vs Unknown

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/8/2014 ORDERING that the 18 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's alleged due process violation for the improper screening of his administrative grievances are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WILLIAM LINNIHAN, 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-2575 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN FOULK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 14, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 14, 2014, are adopted in full; and 28 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s alleged due process violation for the improper screening of his 2 administrative grievances are dismissed without leave to amend. 3 DATED: 4 Dated: July 8, 2014 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?