AIG Specialty Insurance Company v. Phoenician LLC, et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/5/14 ORDERING that AIG Specialty's Ex Parte Application is GRANTED IN PART as to Exhibits 1-5, 8-33, 35, 37-50, and 63-66 and DENIED IN PART as to the remaining Exhibits and Rodrick Reed's affidavit. The remaining documents appear to make no reference to information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise sensitive. Exhibits 1-5, 8-33, 35, 37-50, and 63-66, submitted on 8/22/14, are deemed filed under SEAL. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP
515 South Flower Street, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90071

10
11
12

AIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY f/k/a CHARTIS SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY f/k/a
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL
SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE CO.,

13
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

vs.
PHOENICIAN LLC, PHOENICIAN
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, and
EVEREST INDEMNITY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants.

20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:13-CV-02578-WBS-DAD
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART AIG SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR ORDER DEEMING
THE DECLARATION OF RODRICK REED
AND EXHIBITS [1-69] IN SUPPORT OF
OPPOSITION TO EVEREST INDEMNITY
INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO
DISMISS FILED UNDER SEAL

21
22
23
24
25

The Court, having read and considered plaintiff AIG Specialty Insurance Company’s
(“AIG Specialty”) Ex Parte Application for an Order deeming the Declaration of Rodrick Reed
and Exhibits 1–69, (thereto in support of AIG Specialty’s Opposition to Everest Indemnity
Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss) filed under seal, as well as the Declaration of Eric B.

26
Hermanson and Declaration of Michael Houshmand in support thereof, and for good cause
27
appearing,
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION
14176520v.1

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,

2

1.

That AIG Specialty’s Ex Parte Application is GRANTED IN PART as to Exhibits

3

1–5, 8–33, 35, 37–50, and 63–66 and DENIED IN PART as to the remaining Exhibits and

4

Rodrick Reed’s affidavit. The remaining documents appear to make no reference to information

5

that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise sensitive.

6
7

2.

That Exhibits 1–5, 8–33, 35, 37–50, and 63–66, submitted on August 22, 2014, are

deemed filed under seal.

8
9

Dated: September 5, 2014

PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP
515 South Flower Street, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90071

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION
14176520v.1